[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] mk: replace the combined library with a linker script

Thomas Monjalon thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com
Wed Mar 2 13:40:59 CET 2016


2016-03-02 14:30, Panu Matilainen:
> On 03/01/2016 04:48 PM, Panu Matilainen wrote:
> > On 03/01/2016 03:40 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> >> ping
> >> I would like to be sure nothing is forgotten in this new revision.
> >
> > Sorry, didn't realize you were waiting for input from me, it feels a bit
> > strange to comment on something supposedly coming from myself :)
> >
> >> 2016-02-23 23:20, Thomas Monjalon:
> >>> From: Panu Matilainen <pmatilai at redhat.com>
> >>>
> >>> The physically linked-together combined library has been an increasing
> >>> source of problems, as was predicted when library and symbol versioning
> >>> was introduced. Replace the complex and fragile construction with a
> >>> simple linker script which achieves the same without all the problems,
> >>> remove the related kludges from eg mlx drivers.
> >>>
> >>> Since creating the linker script is practically zero cost, remove the
> >>> config option and just create it always.
> >>>
> >>> Based on a patch by Sergio Gonzales Monroy, linker script approach
> >>> initially suggested by Neil Horman.
> >>>
> >>> Suggested-by: Sergio Gonzalez Monroy <sergio.gonzalez.monroy at intel.com>
> >>> Suggested-by: Neil Horman <nhorman at tuxdriver.com>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Panu Matilainen <pmatilai at redhat.com>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com>
> >>> ---
> >>> v2:
> >>> - move RTE_LIBNAME assignment rte.vars.mk to rte.combinedlib.mk
> >>> - update crypto
> >>> - update doc
> >>> - update rte.app.mk
> >>> - update test-build.sh
> >>
> >
> > Briefly tested, gets generated and installed as it should etc - looks
> > good to me.
> 
> Forgot to note that the patch doesn't apply anymore because of 
> scripts/test-build.sh changes, so it needs a rebase. Want me to send a 
> v3 or will you handle it when committing?
> 
> On a related note, if this is about to go in then I'd rather have it 
> sooner than later because it also conflicts with the LDLIBS fixing 
> that's been slowly going on for months and months but been on hold 
> lately, partly because of this hangup.

Applied, thanks


More information about the dev mailing list