[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/3] kcp: add kernel control path kernel module

Vincent JARDIN vincent.jardin at 6wind.com
Thu Mar 10 07:31:16 CET 2016


Le 10 mars 2016 01:06, "Thomas Monjalon" <thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com> a
écrit :
>
> 2016-03-02 23:35, Thomas Monjalon:
> > 2016-03-02 12:21, Thomas Monjalon:
> > > 2016-03-02 11:47, Vincent JARDIN:
> > > > Le 02/03/2016 09:27, Panu Matilainen a écrit :
> > > > >>> I'd like to see these be merged.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> Jay
> > > > >>
> > > > >> The code is really not ready. I am okay with cooperative
development
> > > > >> but the current code needs to go into a staging type tree.
> > > > >> No compatibility, no ABI guarantees, more of an RFC.
> > > > >> Don't want vendors building products with it then screaming when
it
> > > > >> gets rebuilt/reworked/scrapped.
> > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > > > Exactly.
> > > >
> > > > +1 too
> > > >
> > > > We need to build on this innovation while there is a path for kernel
> > > > mainstream. The logic of using a staging is a good one.
> > > >
> > > > Thomas,
> > > >
> > > > can we open a staging folder into the DPDK like it is done into the
kernel?
> > >
> > > It's possible to create a staging directory if everybody agree.
> > > It is important to state in a README file or in the doc/ that
> > > there will be no guarantee (no stable ABI, no validation and can be
dropped)
> > > and that it is a work in progress, a suggestion to discuss with the
kernel
> > > community.
> > >
> > > The kernel modules must clearly target an upstream integration.
> >
> > Actually the examples directory has been used as a staging for ethtool
and
> > lthread. We also have the crypto API which is still experimental.
> > So I think we must decide among these 3 solutions:
> >       - no special directory, just mark and document an experimental
state
> >       - put only kcp/kdp in the staging directory

I do prefer this option.

> >       - put kcp/kdp in staging and move other experimental libs here
>
> Any opinion? Are we targetting upstream work without any DPDK staging?
>
> Please let's make clear the status of these patches.


More information about the dev mailing list