[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v11 0/8] ethdev: 100G and link speed API refactoring

[Zhang, Helin]

Hi Thomas

Beilei is investigating that, she will give her findings soon later, and possibly a fix after validating that.
Thanks!

Regards,
Helin

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com]
> Sent: Friday, March 25, 2016 5:36 PM
> To: Xu, Qian Q <qian.q.xu at intel.com>
> Cc: dev at dpdk.org; Marc <marcdevel at gmail.com>; Ananyev, Konstantin
> <konstantin.ananyev at intel.com>; Lu, Wenzhuo <wenzhuo.lu at intel.com>;
> Zhang, Helin <helin.zhang at intel.com>; Richardson, Bruce
> <bruce.richardson at intel.com>; Glynn, Michael J <michael.j.glynn at intel.com>
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v11 0/8] ethdev: 100G and link speed API
> refactoring
> 
> Is there someone investigating the issue?
> I think it should be simple to fix for someone mastering these Intel drivers.
> 
> 2016-03-25 01:02, Xu, Qian Q:
> > Marc
> > #Test1 is just a simple test. Just launch testpmd with these nic port.
> > ./testpmd –c 0x3 –n 4 -- -i
> >
> > Thanks
> > Qian
> >
> > From: marc.sune at gmail.com [mailto:marc.sune at gmail.com] On Behalf Of
> > Marc
> > Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2016 3:48 PM
> > To: Xu, Qian Q
> > Cc: Thomas Monjalon; Ananyev, Konstantin; Lu, Wenzhuo; Zhang, Helin;
> > Richardson, Bruce; dev at dpdk.org
> > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v11 0/8] ethdev: 100G and link speed
> > API refactoring
> >
> >
> >
> > On 24 March 2016 at 07:21, Xu, Qian Q
> <qian.q.xu at intel.com<mailto:qian.q.xu at intel.com>> wrote:
> > Marc
> > I didn’t quite get your points, I observed that after applying this patchset, all
> intel nic can’t be started, maybe something wrong happened when you check
> the duplex/autoneg value for different NICs. If we want to merge the patchset in
> RC2, we need fix them. Maybe not an easy job in several days.
> >
> > Is this test#1 one of the tests contained in the DPDK repository or is it an
> internal test?
> >
> > Marc
> >
> >
> >
> > Thanks
> > Qian
> >
> > From: marc.sune at gmail.com<mailto:marc.sune at gmail.com>
> > [mailto:marc.sune at gmail.com<mailto:marc.sune at gmail.com>] On Behalf Of
> > Marc
> > Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2016 4:54 AM
> > To: Xu, Qian Q
> > Cc: Thomas Monjalon; Ananyev, Konstantin; Lu, Wenzhuo; Zhang, Helin;
> > Richardson, Bruce; dev at dpdk.org<mailto:dev at dpdk.org>
> >
> > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v11 0/8] ethdev: 100G and link speed
> > API refactoring
> >
> > Qian,
> >
> > On 23 March 2016 at 02:18, Xu, Qian Q
> <qian.q.xu at intel.com<mailto:qian.q.xu at intel.com>> wrote:
> > We have tested with intel nic and found port can't be started for all
> nics:ixgbe/i40e/igb/bonding, see attached mail for more details. Please check
> and fix it.
> >
> >
> > Thanks
> > Qian
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org<mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org>]
> > On Behalf Of Thomas Monjalon
> > Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2016 3:59 AM
> > To: Ananyev, Konstantin; Lu, Wenzhuo; Zhang, Helin
> > Cc: marcdevel at gmail.com<mailto:marcdevel at gmail.com>; Richardson,
> > Bruce; dev at dpdk.org<mailto:dev at dpdk.org>
> > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v11 0/8] ethdev: 100G and link speed
> > API refactoring
> >
> > 2016-03-17 19:08, Thomas Monjalon:
> > > There are still too few tests and reviews, especially for
> > > autonegotiation with Intel devices (patch #6).
> > > I would not be surprised to see some bugs in this rework.
> >
> > Any feedback about autoneg in e1000/ixgbe/i40e?
> > Has it been tested before its integration in RC2?
> >
> > > The capabilities must be adapted per device. It can be improved in a
> > > separate patch.
> > >
> > > It will be integrated in 16.04-rc2.
> > > Please test and review shortly, thanks!
> >
> >
> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> > From: "Xu, Qian Q" <qian.q.xu at intel.com<mailto:qian.q.xu at intel.com>>
> > To: "Cao, Waterman"
> > <waterman.cao at intel.com<mailto:waterman.cao at intel.com>>, "Glynn,
> > Michael J"
> > <michael.j.glynn at intel.com<mailto:michael.j.glynn at intel.com>>
> > Cc: "Richardson, Bruce"
> > <bruce.richardson at intel.com<mailto:bruce.richardson at intel.com>>, "Zhu,
> > Heqing" <heqing.zhu at intel.com<mailto:heqing.zhu at intel.com>>,
> > "O'Driscoll, Tim"
> > <tim.odriscoll at intel.com<mailto:tim.odriscoll at intel.com>>, "Mcnamara,
> > John" <john.mcnamara at intel.com<mailto:john.mcnamara at intel.com>>, "Xu,
> > HuilongX" <huilongx.xu at intel.com<mailto:huilongx.xu at intel.com>>, "Fu,
> > JingguoX" <jingguox.fu at intel.com<mailto:jingguox.fu at intel.com>>, "Xu,
> > Qian Q" <qian.q.xu at intel.com<mailto:qian.q.xu at intel.com>>, "Zhang,
> > Helin" <helin.zhang at intel.com<mailto:helin.zhang at intel.com>>
> > Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2016 06:41:37 +0000
> > Subject: RE: DPDK link speed with Intel devices Hi, all We have worked
> > out the basic test cases for the patchset.
> > 1. Test the link speed on major Intel NICs to see if the speed is right.
> > 2. Test the auto-negoation on major Intel NICs to ensure it's working.
> > Nic covered: ixgbe, igb, i40e, fm10k, bonding(SW), virtio(SW)
> >
> > When we run the Test#1 for all major NICs. We found that all these NIC port(igb,
> ixgbe, i40e, fm10k) can't be started. Pls check, if the patch is applied, all INTEL
> port can't be start, terrible things!
> >
> > Interactive-mode selected
> > Configuring Port 0 (socket 0)
> > PMD: ixgbe_dev_tx_queue_setup(): sw_ring=0x7f13e99e3440
> > hw_ring=0x7f13e99e5480 dma_addr=0x8299e5480
> > PMD: ixgbe_set_tx_function(): Using simple tx code path
> > PMD: ixgbe_set_tx_function(): Vector tx enabled.
> > PMD: ixgbe_dev_rx_queue_setup(): sw_ring=0x7f13ffcb8080
> > sw_sc_ring=0x7f13ffcbaac0 hw_ring=0x7f13e99d3380 dma_addr=0x8299d3380
> > PMD: ixgbe_dev_start(): Invalid link_speeds for port 0;
> > autonegotiation disabled Fail to start port 0 Configuring Port 1
> > (socket 0)
> > PMD: i40e_set_tx_function_flag(): Vector tx can be enabled on this txq.
> > PMD: i40e_dev_rx_queue_setup(): Rx Burst Bulk Alloc Preconditions are
> satisfied. Rx Burst Bulk Alloc function will be used on port=1, queue=0.
> > PMD: i40e_dev_start(): Invalid link_speeds for port 1; autonegotiation
> > disabled
> >
> >
> > Just to double-check; is the test#1 adapted to the _new_ API that ethdev has
> to set link speeds? For the output it seems autoneg is disabled => fixed speed,
> hence the new bitmaps have to be used.
> >
> > (I am not claiming patchset is bug free; there might be issues still)
> >
> > Regards
> > marc
> >
> > Fail to start port 1
> > Please stop the ports first
> > Done
> >
> > Thanks
> > Qian
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Cao, Waterman
> > Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2016 11:06 AM
> > To: Glynn, Michael J
> > Cc: Richardson, Bruce; Zhu, Heqing; O'Driscoll, Tim; Mcnamara, John;
> > Xu, Qian Q; Cao, Waterman
> > Subject: RE: DPDK link speed with Intel devices
> >
> > Hi Mike,
> >
> >         We just knew this patch set last week.
> >         Since this patch set is required to test with a lot of NIC,  we need
> more document from Dev about this patch.
> >         Currently, Qian is working on with Wenzhuo on it now.
> >
> > Waterman
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Glynn, Michael J
> > Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2016 1:31 AM
> > To: Cao, Waterman
> > <waterman.cao at intel.com<mailto:waterman.cao at intel.com>>
> > Cc: Richardson, Bruce
> > <bruce.richardson at intel.com<mailto:bruce.richardson at intel.com>>; Zhu,
> > Heqing <heqing.zhu at intel.com<mailto:heqing.zhu at intel.com>>;
> > O'Driscoll, Tim
> > <tim.odriscoll at intel.com<mailto:tim.odriscoll at intel.com>>; Mcnamara,
> > John <john.mcnamara at intel.com<mailto:john.mcnamara at intel.com>>
> > Subject: FW: DPDK link speed with Intel devices
> > Importance: High
> >
> > Hi Waterman, all
> >
> > See below - are you aware? And if so where are we with testing/resolution?
> >
> > Regards
> > Mike
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Thomas Monjalon
> >
> [mailto:thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com<mailto:thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com>]
> > Sent: Monday, March 21, 2016 2:19 PM
> > To: O'Driscoll, Tim
> > <tim.odriscoll at intel.com<mailto:tim.odriscoll at intel.com>>; Glynn,
> > Michael J
> > <michael.j.glynn at intel.com<mailto:michael.j.glynn at intel.com>>; Zhu,
> > Heqing <heqing.zhu at intel.com<mailto:heqing.zhu at intel.com>>
> > Cc: vincent.jardin at 6wind.com<mailto:vincent.jardin at 6wind.com>
> > Subject: DPDK link speed with Intel devices
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > We are still waiting for test feedbacks for this important patchset:
> >         ethdev: 100G and link speed API refactoring It is possible that it
> breaks the autonegotiation in e1000/ixgbe/i40e.
> >
> > Thanks for taking care.
> >
> >
>