[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1] net: i40e: add VLAN tag size to RXMAX

[Nikita Kozlov]

Hello,

On 09/ 1/15 07:34 AM, Zhang, Helin wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Vlad Zolotarov [mailto:vladz at cloudius-systems.com]
>> Sent: Monday, August 31, 2015 2:42 PM
>> To: dev at dpdk.org
>> Cc: Zhang, Helin; Ananyev, Konstantin; avi at cloudius-systems.com; Vlad
>> Zolotarov
>> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1] net: i40e: add VLAN tag size to RXMAX
>>
>> HW requires it regardless the presence of the VLAN tag in the received frame.
>> Otherwise Rx frames are being filtered out on the MTU-4 boundary.
> Maximum packet length could have different meanings from MTU. I agree with
> you to have it be regardless of vlan tag length.
>
>> Signed-off-by: Vlad Zolotarov <vladz at cloudius-systems.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx.c | 2 +-
>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx.c b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx.c index
>> eae4ab0..22aaeb1 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx.c
>> @@ -3156,7 +3156,7 @@ i40e_rx_queue_init(struct i40e_rx_queue *rxq)
>>  		rx_ctx.hsplit_0 = I40E_HEADER_SPLIT_ALL;
>>  	else
>>  		rx_ctx.hsplit_0 = I40E_HEADER_SPLIT_NONE;
>> -	rx_ctx.rxmax = rxq->max_pkt_len;
>> +	rx_ctx.rxmax = rxq->max_pkt_len + I40E_VLAN_TAG_SIZE;
> It needs to take into account the double vlan case, and also VF case.
> It seems it needs more code changes. Thank you for the contribution!
I was wondering if this "bug" haven't been forgotten ? Even if it his
not patched yet maybe it is worth an entry in the documentation ?
>
> Regards,
> Helin
>
>>  	rx_ctx.tphrdesc_ena = 1;
>>  	rx_ctx.tphwdesc_ena = 1;
>>  	rx_ctx.tphdata_ena = 1;
>> --
>> 2.1.0