[dpdk-dev] rte_malloc
Sergio Gonzalez Monroy
sergio.gonzalez.monroy at intel.com
Tue May 10 18:12:23 CEST 2016
Have you tried to run the unit tests? (Run 'app/test' application, then
'malloc_autotest')
Sergio
On 10/05/2016 16:55, Mahdi Moradmand Badie wrote:
> #!/bin/sh
> ./build/app/Mahdi_test -c 0x55 --master-lcore 0
>
> On 10 May 2016 at 11:31, Sergio Gonzalez Monroy
> <sergio.gonzalez.monroy at intel.com
> <mailto:sergio.gonzalez.monroy at intel.com>> wrote:
>
> Forgot to ask,
>
> What's the command line you are using to run the app?
>
> Sergio
>
>
> On 10/05/2016 16:17, Mahdi Moradmand Badie wrote:
>> Thanks Sergio,
>> Yes sure,
>> I attached files, it seems so easy but doesn't work.
>> Thanks,
>>
>> On 10 May 2016 at 04:12, Sergio Gonzalez Monroy
>> <sergio.gonzalez.monroy at intel.com
>> <mailto:sergio.gonzalez.monroy at intel.com>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 09/05/2016 18:32, Mahdi Moradmand Badie wrote:
>>
>> Hello All,
>>
>> I had a problem regarding use the rte_malloc.
>> I want to know if I want to use rte_malloc instead of
>> malloc just mak
>> change like this
>> struct lcore_params *p = malloc
>> <http://dpdk.org/doc/api/rte__malloc_8h.html#afb7316a4ec228ed9b8ffc1864b03d85b>
>> (sizeof(*p)); ==>
>> struct lcore_params *p = rte_malloc
>> <http://dpdk.org/doc/api/rte__malloc_8h.html#afb7316a4ec228ed9b8ffc1864b03d85b>(NULL,
>> sizeof(*p), 0);
>> is enough ?
>>
>>
>> Yes, malloc(sizeof(*p)) has an equivalent behavior to
>> rte_malloc(NULL, sizeof(*p), 0)
>> in the context of a DPDK application.
>>
>> Because I have problem and Segmentation fault (core
>> dumped) ??
>>
>>
>> Could you provide more details of how to reproduce or could
>> you try to
>> reproduce your problem using a very simple example like
>> examples/helloworld ?
>>
>> Sergio
>>
>> Thanks in advance,
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> M at hdi Mor at dm@nd B at die
>
>
>
>
> --
> M at hdi Mor at dm@nd B at die
More information about the dev
mailing list