[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] sched: fix useless call

[Dumitrescu, Cristian]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mrzyglod, DanielX T
> Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2016 11:11 AM
> To: Dumitrescu, Cristian <cristian.dumitrescu at intel.com>
> Cc: dev at dpdk.org; Mrzyglod, DanielX T <danielx.t.mrzyglod at intel.com>
> Subject: [PATCH] sched: fix useless call
> 
> Fix issue reported by Coverity.
> Coverity ID 13338
> 
> A function call that seems to have an intended effect has no actual effect
> on the logic of the program.
> 
> In rte_sched_port_free: A function is called that is only useful for its
> return value, and this value is ignored.
> 
> Fixes: de3cfa2c9823 ("sched: initial import")
> 
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Mrzyglod <danielx.t.mrzyglod at intel.com>
> ---
>  lib/librte_sched/rte_sched.c | 1 -
>  1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/lib/librte_sched/rte_sched.c b/lib/librte_sched/rte_sched.c
> index 1609ea8..9b962a6 100644
> --- a/lib/librte_sched/rte_sched.c
> +++ b/lib/librte_sched/rte_sched.c
> @@ -749,7 +749,6 @@ rte_sched_port_free(struct rte_sched_port *port)
>  			rte_pktmbuf_free(mbufs[i]);
>  	}
> 
> -	rte_bitmap_free(port->bmp);
>  	rte_free(port);
>  }
> 
> --
> 2.5.5

NAK.

This needs to be flagged out as a false positive to Coverity.

As previously discussed on this email list, the rte_bitmap_free() is an API function that works as a placeholder for any resource freeing that needs to be done for the bitmap. The API function should not be removed and also the call to this function from the rte_sched_port_free() should not be removed either.

Thanks,
Cristian