[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/3] eal/drivers: prefix driver REGISTER macros with EAL
Thomas Monjalon
thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com
Fri Oct 7 15:51:44 CEST 2016
2016-10-07 19:11, Shreyansh Jain:
> --- a/mk/internal/rte.compile-pre.mk
> +++ b/mk/internal/rte.compile-pre.mk
> @@ -87,7 +87,7 @@ endif
> PMDINFO_GEN = $(RTE_SDK_BIN)/app/dpdk-pmdinfogen $@ $@.pmd.c
> PMDINFO_CC = $(CC) $(CPPFLAGS) $(CFLAGS) -c -o $@.pmd.o $@.pmd.c
> PMDINFO_LD = $(CROSS)ld $(LDFLAGS) -r -o $@.o $@.pmd.o $@
> -PMDINFO_TO_O = if grep -q 'DRIVER_REGISTER_.*(.*)' $<; then \
> +PMDINFO_TO_O = if grep 'EAL_REGISTER_.*(.*)' $<; then \
> echo "$(if $V,$(PMDINFO_GEN), PMDINFO $@.pmd.c)" && \
> $(PMDINFO_GEN) && \
> echo "$(if $V,$(PMDINFO_CC), CC $@.pmd.o)" && \
>
> --->8---
> CC eal_pci_vfio.o
> PMDINFO eal_pci_vfio.o.pmd.c
> /bin/sh: 1:
> /home/shreyansh/build/DPDK/02_dpdk/x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc/app/dpdk-pmdinfogen:
> not found
> /home/shreyansh/build/DPDK/02_dpdk/mk/internal/rte.compile-pre.mk:138:
> recipe for target 'eal_pci_vfio.o' failed
> --->8---
>
> I don't think PMDINFO should be running on eal_pci_vfio file. Isn't it?
Every files are scanned for the pattern.
> Is it because EAL_REGISTER_* is matching EAL_REGISTER_TAILQ like macro
> as well?
Probably.
That's another argument in favor of good prefixes.
I think you should use RTE_DRIVER_REGISTER_ or better, RTE_PMD_REGISTER_
>
> I am not very well versed with how PMDINFO is linking with the build
> system so any hints/insight into this would be really helpful.
>
> One I get more clarity on this, I will push a new version of this patch.
Thanks
More information about the dev
mailing list