[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 00/19] KNI checkpatch cleanup

[Ferruh Yigit]

Hi Pattan,

On 10/5/2016 11:38 AM, Pattan, Reshma wrote:
> Hi Ferruh,
> 
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Ferruh Yigit
>> Sent: Thursday, September 15, 2016 4:46 PM
>> To: dev at dpdk.org
>> Cc: Stephen Hemminger <stephen at networkplumber.org>; Ferruh Yigit
>> <ferruh.yigit at itnel.com>
>> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 00/19] KNI checkpatch cleanup
>>
>> KNI checkpatch cleanup, mostly non-functional but cosmetic modifications.
>> Only functional change is related logging, switched to kernel dynamic logging
>> and compile time KNI debug options removed, some log message levels
>> updated.
>>
>> Ferruh Yigit (19):
>>   kni: move externs to the header file
>>   kni: uninitialize global variables
>>   kni: make static struct const
>>   kni: whitespace, indentation, long line corrections
>>   kni: prefer unsigned int to unsigned
>>   kni: remove useless return
>>   kni: comparisons should place the constant on the right
>>   kni: trailing statements should be on next line
>>   kni: do not use assignment in if condition
>>   kni: macros with complex values should be enclosed in parentheses
>>   kni: prefer min_t to min
>>   kni: prefer ether_addr_copy to memcpy
>>   kni: update kernel logging
>>   kni: remove unnecessary 'out of memory' message
>>   kni: move functions to eliminate function declarations
>>   kni: remove compile time debug configuration
>>   kni: updated log messages
>>   kni: prefer uint32_t to unsigned int
>>   kni: move kernel version ifdefs to compat header
>>
> 
> Patches 4,5,11 and 13-19 are failed to apply.
> 

The patchset v3 has a dependency, mentioned in cover letter, I tested
with that patch and patches applied well for me,
would you mind trying again with that dependent patch applied please?

Thanks,
ferruh