[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/3] eal/drivers: prefix driver REGISTER macros with EAL

Neil Horman nhorman at tuxdriver.com
Mon Oct 17 15:09:11 CEST 2016


On Sat, Oct 08, 2016 at 12:47:59PM +0000, Shreyansh Jain wrote:
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com]
> > Sent: Friday, October 07, 2016 7:15 PM
> > To: Shreyansh Jain <shreyansh.jain at nxp.com>
> > Cc: david.marchand at 6wind.com; dev at dpdk.org
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] eal/drivers: prefix driver REGISTER macros with EAL
> > 
> > 2016-10-07 19:03, Shreyansh Jain:
> > > DRIVER_REGISTER_PCI -> EAL_REGISTER_PCI
> > > DRIVER_REGISTER_PCI_TABLE -> EAL_REGISTER_PCI_TABLE
> > 
> > Why not RTE_ prefix instead of EAL_?
> 
> Because while searching for similar naming pattern I came across other macros like EAL_REGISTER_TAILQ which were within librte_eal/eal/* folders.
> 
This is why we were suggesting to make the regex in the makefile more specific,
to avoid matching on the TAILQ macro.

> > Why 3 patches? As there is no specific comment in each, I think you can
> > squash.
> 
> Because each of the patch are common and tightly related changes. The replacement touches a large number of files, even though the change itself is small. By splitting, it makes review (or minor misses) easier - at least for me.
> Anyways, if as a maintainer you prefer having a single bulk, I have no issues.
> 
> I will send next version with RTE_* and the 'grep -E' suggestion from Neil.
> 
> -
> Shreyansh
> 


More information about the dev mailing list