[dpdk-dev] mbuf changes

[Ramia, Kannan Babu]

I didn't get your question. The only information exchanged between the stages is mbuf pointer. So the information has to be in mbuf, whether it's part of Meta or in private area in the packet buffer headroom is that the question you are asking. The private area is application specific, while I am looking for the port information getting updated from driver to application and it's generic to multiple applications. 

Regards
Kannan Babu


-----Original Message-----
From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2016 6:54 PM
To: Ramia, Kannan Babu <kannan.babu.ramia at intel.com>
Cc: dev at dpdk.org; Olivier Matz <olivier.matz at 6wind.com>; Morten Brørup <mb at smartsharesystems.com>; Ananyev, Konstantin <konstantin.ananyev at intel.com>; Richardson, Bruce <bruce.richardson at intel.com>; Wiles, Keith <keith.wiles at intel.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] mbuf changes

2016-10-25 13:04, Ramia, Kannan Babu:
> Port filed is important meta information for the application use like 
> CGNAT vEPC functions etc.
> I strongly recommend to keep the field in mind meta.

Have you tried to move this field outside of the mbuf?
What is the performance degradation?
We need more information than some assumptions.