[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/2] net/vhost: add pmd xstats

Yuanhan Liu yuanhan.liu at linux.intel.com
Tue Sep 20 12:56:38 CEST 2016


On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 05:36:45PM +0800, Zhiyong Yang wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/net/vhost/rte_eth_vhost.c b/drivers/net/vhost/rte_eth_vhost.c
> index 9157bf1..c3f404d 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/vhost/rte_eth_vhost.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/vhost/rte_eth_vhost.c
> @@ -78,6 +78,7 @@ struct vhost_stats {
>  	uint64_t missed_pkts;
>  	uint64_t rx_bytes;
>  	uint64_t tx_bytes;
> +	uint64_t xstats[16];
>  };
>  
>  struct vhost_queue {
> @@ -131,6 +132,252 @@ struct rte_vhost_vring_state {
>  
>  static struct rte_vhost_vring_state *vring_states[RTE_MAX_ETHPORTS];
>  
> +enum vhost_xstats_pkts {
> +	VHOST_UNDERSIZE_PKT = 0,
> +	VHOST_64_PKT,
> +	VHOST_65_TO_127_PKT,
> +	VHOST_128_TO_255_PKT,
> +	VHOST_256_TO_511_PKT,
> +	VHOST_512_TO_1023_PKT,
> +	VHOST_1024_TO_1522_PKT,
> +	VHOST_1523_TO_MAX_PKT,
> +	VHOST_BROADCAST_PKT,
> +	VHOST_MULTICAST_PKT,
> +	VHOST_ERRORS_PKT,
> +	VHOST_ERRORS_FRAGMENTED,
> +	VHOST_ERRORS_JABBER,
> +	VHOST_UNKNOWN_PROTOCOL,
> +};

The definetion should go before "struct vhost_stats".

And VHOST_UNKNOWN_PROTOCOL should be VHOST_XSTATS_MAX. With that, the
hardcoded number "16" could be avoided and replaced by it.

> +
> +#define VHOST_XSTATS_NAME_SIZE 64
> +
> +struct vhost_xstats_name_off {
> +	char name[VHOST_XSTATS_NAME_SIZE];
> +	uint64_t offset;
> +};
> +
> +/* [rt]_qX_ is prepended to the name string here */
> +static const struct vhost_xstats_name_off vhost_rxq_stat_strings[] = {
> +	{"good_packets",
> +	 offsetof(struct vhost_queue, stats.rx_pkts)},
> +	{"total_bytes",
> +	 offsetof(struct vhost_queue, stats.rx_bytes)},
> +	{"missed_pkts",
> +	 offsetof(struct vhost_queue, stats.missed_pkts)},
> +	{"broadcast_packets",
> +	 offsetof(struct vhost_queue, stats.xstats[VHOST_BROADCAST_PKT])},
> +	{"multicast_packets",
> +	 offsetof(struct vhost_queue, stats.xstats[VHOST_MULTICAST_PKT])},
> +	{"undersize_packets",
> +	 offsetof(struct vhost_queue, stats.xstats[VHOST_UNDERSIZE_PKT])},
> +	{"size_64_packets",
> +	 offsetof(struct vhost_queue, stats.xstats[VHOST_64_PKT])},
> +	{"size_65_to_127_packets",
> +	 offsetof(struct vhost_queue, stats.xstats[VHOST_65_TO_127_PKT])},
> +	{"size_128_to_255_packets",
> +	 offsetof(struct vhost_queue, stats.xstats[VHOST_128_TO_255_PKT])},
> +	{"size_256_to_511_packets",
> +	 offsetof(struct vhost_queue, stats.xstats[VHOST_256_TO_511_PKT])},
> +	{"size_512_to_1023_packets",
> +	 offsetof(struct vhost_queue, stats.xstats[VHOST_512_TO_1023_PKT])},
> +	{"size_1024_to_1522_packets",
> +	 offsetof(struct vhost_queue, stats.xstats[VHOST_1024_TO_1522_PKT])},
> +	{"size_1523_to_max_packets",
> +	 offsetof(struct vhost_queue, stats.xstats[VHOST_1523_TO_MAX_PKT])},
> +	{"errors_with_bad_CRC",
> +	 offsetof(struct vhost_queue, stats.xstats[VHOST_ERRORS_PKT])},
> +	{"fragmented_errors",
> +	 offsetof(struct vhost_queue, stats.xstats[VHOST_ERRORS_FRAGMENTED])},
> +	{"jabber_errors",
> +	 offsetof(struct vhost_queue, stats.xstats[VHOST_ERRORS_JABBER])},
> +	{"unknown_protos_packets",
> +	 offsetof(struct vhost_queue, stats.xstats[VHOST_UNKNOWN_PROTOCOL])},

Hmm, is "unknown_protos_packets" a valid stats? Why we should handle it
here? Besides, it will always not be accessed, right? I mean,
VHOST_NB_RXQ_XSTATS makes sure that.

> +};
> +
> +/* [tx]_qX_ is prepended to the name string here */
> +static const struct vhost_xstats_name_off vhost_txq_stat_strings[] = {
> +	{"good_packets",
> +	 offsetof(struct vhost_queue, stats.tx_pkts)},
> +	{"total_bytes",
> +	 offsetof(struct vhost_queue, stats.tx_bytes)},
> +	{"missed_pkts",
> +	 offsetof(struct vhost_queue, stats.missed_pkts)},
> +	{"broadcast_packets",
> +	 offsetof(struct vhost_queue, stats.xstats[VHOST_BROADCAST_PKT])},
> +	{"multicast_packets",
> +	 offsetof(struct vhost_queue, stats.xstats[VHOST_MULTICAST_PKT])},
> +	{"size_64_packets",
> +	 offsetof(struct vhost_queue, stats.xstats[VHOST_64_PKT])},
> +	{"size_65_to_127_packets",
> +	 offsetof(struct vhost_queue, stats.xstats[VHOST_65_TO_127_PKT])},
> +	{"size_128_to_255_packets",
> +	 offsetof(struct vhost_queue, stats.xstats[VHOST_128_TO_255_PKT])},
> +	{"size_256_to_511_packets",
> +	 offsetof(struct vhost_queue, stats.xstats[VHOST_256_TO_511_PKT])},
> +	{"size_512_to_1023_packets",
> +	 offsetof(struct vhost_queue, stats.xstats[VHOST_512_TO_1023_PKT])},
> +	{"size_1024_to_1522_packets",
> +	 offsetof(struct vhost_queue, stats.xstats[VHOST_1024_TO_1522_PKT])},
> +	{"size_1523_to_max_packets",
> +	 offsetof(struct vhost_queue, stats.xstats[VHOST_1523_TO_MAX_PKT])},
> +	{"errors_with_bad_CRC",
> +	 offsetof(struct vhost_queue, stats.xstats[VHOST_ERRORS_PKT])},
> +};
> +
> +#define VHOST_NB_RXQ_XSTATS (sizeof(vhost_rxq_stat_strings) / \
> +			     sizeof(vhost_rxq_stat_strings[0]))
> +
> +#define VHOST_NB_TXQ_XSTATS (sizeof(vhost_txq_stat_strings) / \
> +			     sizeof(vhost_txq_stat_strings[0]))
> +
> +static void
> +vhost_dev_xstats_reset(struct rte_eth_dev *dev)
> +{
> +	struct vhost_queue *vqrx = NULL;
> +	struct vhost_queue *vqtx = NULL;

I will not introduce two var here: I'd just define one, vq.

> +	unsigned int i = 0;
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < dev->data->nb_rx_queues; i++) {
> +		vqrx = dev->data->rx_queues[i];
> +		if (!vqrx)
> +			continue;
> +		memset(&vqrx->stats, 0, sizeof(vqrx->stats));
> +	}
> +	for (i = 0; i < dev->data->nb_tx_queues; i++) {
> +		vqtx = dev->data->tx_queues[i];
> +		if (!vqtx)
> +			continue;
> +		memset(&vqtx->stats, 0, sizeof(vqtx->stats));
> +	}
> +}
> +
> +static int
> +vhost_dev_xstats_get_names(struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
> +			   struct rte_eth_xstat_name *xstats_names,
> +			   unsigned int limit __rte_unused)
> +{
> +	unsigned int i = 0;
> +	unsigned int t = 0;
> +	int count = 0;
> +	int nstats = dev->data->nb_rx_queues * VHOST_NB_RXQ_XSTATS
> +			+ dev->data->nb_tx_queues * VHOST_NB_TXQ_XSTATS;
> +
> +	if (!xstats_names)
> +		return nstats;
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < dev->data->nb_rx_queues; i++) {
> +		if (!dev->data->rx_queues[i])
> +			continue;
> +		for (t = 0; t < VHOST_NB_RXQ_XSTATS; t++) {
> +			snprintf(xstats_names[count].name,
> +				 sizeof(xstats_names[count].name),
> +				 "rx_q%u_%s", i,
> +				 vhost_rxq_stat_strings[t].name);
> +				 count++;
> +		}
> +	}
> +	for (i = 0; i < dev->data->nb_tx_queues; i++) {
> +		if (!dev->data->tx_queues[i])
> +			continue;
> +		for (t = 0; t < VHOST_NB_TXQ_XSTATS; t++) {
> +			snprintf(xstats_names[count].name,
> +				 sizeof(xstats_names[count].name),
> +				 "tx_q%u_%s", i,
> +				 vhost_txq_stat_strings[t].name);
> +				 count++;
> +		}
> +	}
> +	return count;
> +}
> +
> +static int
> +vhost_dev_xstats_get(struct rte_eth_dev *dev, struct rte_eth_xstat *xstats,
> +		     unsigned int n)
> +{
> +	unsigned int i;
> +	unsigned int t;
> +	unsigned int count = 0;
> +	unsigned int nxstats = dev->data->nb_rx_queues * VHOST_NB_RXQ_XSTATS
> +			     + dev->data->nb_tx_queues * VHOST_NB_TXQ_XSTATS;
> +
> +	if (n < nxstats)
> +		return nxstats;
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < dev->data->nb_rx_queues; i++) {
> +		if (!dev->data->rx_queues[i])
> +			continue;
> +		for (t = 0; t < VHOST_NB_RXQ_XSTATS; t++) {
> +			xstats[count].value =
> +				*(uint64_t *)(((char *)dev->data->rx_queues[i])
> +				+ vhost_rxq_stat_strings[t].offset);
> +			count++;
> +		}
> +	}
> +	for (i = 0; i < dev->data->nb_tx_queues; i++) {
> +		if (!dev->data->tx_queues[i])
> +			continue;
> +		for (t = 0; t < VHOST_NB_TXQ_XSTATS; t++) {
> +			xstats[count].value =
> +				*(uint64_t *)(((char *)dev->data->tx_queues[i])
> +				+ vhost_txq_stat_strings[t].offset);
> +			count++;
> +		}
> +	}
> +	return count;
> +}

> +static void
> +vhost_count_multicast_broadcast(struct vhost_queue *vq,
> +				struct rte_mbuf **bufs,

I would let this function to count one mbuf, so that --->

> +				uint16_t begin,
> +				uint16_t end)
> +{
> +	uint64_t i = 0;
> +	struct ether_addr *ea = NULL;
> +	struct vhost_stats *pstats = &vq->stats;
> +
> +	for (i = begin; i < end; i++) {
> +		ea = rte_pktmbuf_mtod(bufs[i], struct ether_addr *);
> +		if (is_multicast_ether_addr(ea)) {
> +			if (is_broadcast_ether_addr(ea))
> +				pstats->xstats[VHOST_BROADCAST_PKT]++;
> +			else
> +				pstats->xstats[VHOST_MULTICAST_PKT]++;
> +		}
> +	}
> +}
> +
> +static void
> +vhost_update_packet_xstats(struct vhost_queue *vq,
> +			   struct rte_mbuf **bufs,
> +			   uint16_t nb_rxtx)
> +{
> +	uint32_t pkt_len = 0;
> +	uint64_t i = 0;
> +	uint64_t index;
> +	struct vhost_stats *pstats = &vq->stats;
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < nb_rxtx ; i++) {
> +		pkt_len = bufs[i]->pkt_len;
> +		if (pkt_len == 64) {
> +			pstats->xstats[VHOST_64_PKT]++;
> +		} else if (pkt_len > 64 && pkt_len < 1024) {
> +			index = (sizeof(pkt_len) * 8)
> +				- __builtin_clz(pkt_len) - 5;
> +			pstats->xstats[index]++;
> +		} else {
> +			if (pkt_len < 64)
> +				pstats->xstats[VHOST_UNDERSIZE_PKT]++;
> +			else if (pkt_len <= 1522)
> +				pstats->xstats[VHOST_1024_TO_1522_PKT]++;
> +			else if (pkt_len > 1522)
> +				pstats->xstats[VHOST_1523_TO_MAX_PKT]++;
> +		}

... you could put it here, and save another for() loop introdueced by
vhost_count_multicast_broadcast().

BTW, I will use simple vars, say "count", but not "nb_rxtx".

	--yliu


More information about the dev mailing list