[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/3] net/i40e: vf port reset

Zhao1, Wei wei.zhao1 at intel.com
Wed Apr 5 07:42:45 CEST 2017


Hi, jingjing 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Wu, Jingjing
> Sent: Thursday, March 30, 2017 8:33 PM
> To: Zhao1, Wei <wei.zhao1 at intel.com>; dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/3] net/i40e: vf port reset
> 
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Wei Zhao
> > Sent: Thursday, March 30, 2017 5:34 PM
> > To: dev at dpdk.org
> > Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/3] net/i40e: vf port reset
> >
> > The patches mainly finish following functions:
> > 1) get pf reset vf comamand falg from interrupt server function.
> > 2) reset vf port from testpmd app using a command.
> > 3) sore and restore vf related parameters.
> >
> > v2:
> > -change the order of patch in the set.
> > -add more details in patch comment to clarify that  the rte and tespmd
> > patch can also used in pf port reset.
> > -add  rte_free for memory free after restore.
> > -change varible name of reset_number to reset_falg.
> > -fix patch check warning.
> >
> > v3:
> > -fix error of author mail address
> >
> > v4:
> > -fix typo error
> > -add rte_wmb() after change the reset_ports.
> >
> > zhao wei (3):
> >   app/testpmd: add port reset command into testpmd
> >   lib/librte_ether: add support for port reset
> >   net/i40e: implement device reset on port
> 
> 
> Acked-by Jingjing Wu <jingjing.wu at intel.com>
> 
> It looks like you sent 2 V4? Could you suspend one of them in Patchwork?

I have suspend the repetition one.


More information about the dev mailing list