[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/1] fix flow validate comments
John Daley
johndale at cisco.com
Fri Apr 7 00:41:25 CEST 2017
Adrien,
Here is another crack at the comments for rte_flow_validate. Does this
capture what you were explaining to me?
I'm still not crazy about multiple meanings for EEXIST or ENOMEM since
it makes them unusable by apps, but at least the comments try to explain it. In 17.08 what about having PMDs indicate if they support flow
collision and resouce checking, or drop those return codes all together?
cheers,
john
John Daley (1):
ethdev: fix flow validate comments
lib/librte_ether/rte_flow.h | 17 ++++++++++++-----
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
--
2.12.0
More information about the dev
mailing list