[dpdk-dev] next technical board meeting, 2017-04-10

Dumitrescu, Cristian cristian.dumitrescu at intel.com
Mon Apr 10 16:43:42 CEST 2017


It will start in 15 mins.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Wiles, Keith
> Sent: Monday, April 10, 2017 3:34 PM
> To: Yuanhan Liu <yuanhan.liu at linux.intel.com>
> Cc: dev at dpdk.org; techboard at dpdk.org; Jerin Jacob
> <jerin.jacob at caviumnetworks.com>
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] next technical board meeting, 2017-04-10
> 
> Did this meeting take place and meet quorum?
> 
> What is the out come of the meeting?
> 
> > On Apr 10, 2017, at 1:49 AM, Yuanhan Liu <yuanhan.liu at linux.intel.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > The last techboard meeting was canceled, and it's been rescheduled to
> > today, 10th Apr, at 3pm UTC. I should have sent it out a bit earlier.
> > Sorry!
> >
> > The agenda remains the same (see below).
> >
> > 	--yliu
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 06, 2017 at 03:31:43PM +0530, Jerin Jacob wrote:
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >>> Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2017 15:11:07 +0530
> >>> From: Jerin Jacob <jerin.jacob at caviumnetworks.com>
> >>> To: dev at dpdk.org
> >>> Cc: techboard at dpdk.org
> >>> Subject: [dpdk-dev] next technical board meeting, 2017-04-06
> >>> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170306 (1.8.0)
> >>>
> >>> Hello everyone,
> >>>
> >>> A meeting of the DPDK technical board will occur next Thursday,
> >>> April 6th 2017 at 9am UTC?
> >>>
> >>> The meeting takes place on the #dpdk-board channel on IRC.
> >>> This meeting is public, so anybody can join, see below for the agenda.
> >>>
> >>> Jerin
> >>
> >> The meeting got canceled due to lack of quorum.
> >> (6 out of 9 members were present, which is less than 70%(minimum
> quorum))
> >> # http://dpdk.org/about/techboard#meetings
> >>
> >> Yuanhan Liu volunteered to chair the next meeting.
> >> No particular date was agreed for next meeting.
> >>
> >> Yuanhan to follow on mail to select a date/time of next meeting.
> >>
> >>>
> >>> 1) Divergence between DPDK/Linux PF/VF implementations.
> >>>
> >>> Discussions:
> >>> http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2017-March/060529.html
> >>> http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2017-March/060063.html
> >>> http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2016-December/053056.html
> >>>
> >>> 2) Representative for the DPDK governance board
> >>>
> >>> 3) Scope of cmdline and cfgfile libraries in DPDK.
> >>> Discuss the scope of cmdline and cfgfile libraries in DPDK
> >>> and see if we allow more libs like that (Keith proposed a CLI lib),
> >>> or we do not do more,
> >>> or do we target to replace them by better external equivalents?
> >>>
> >>> 4) Community questions/issues
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> 
> Regards,
> Keith



More information about the dev mailing list