[dpdk-dev] error in testpmd when CONFIG_RTE_BUILD_SHARED_LIB=y

Bruce Richardson bruce.richardson at intel.com
Wed Apr 12 12:05:22 CEST 2017


On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 04:52:47AM +0000, Shreyansh Jain wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2017 12:58 AM
> > To: john miller <john.miller at atomicrules.com>
> > Cc: dev at dpdk.org; olivier.matz at 6wind.com; Shreyansh Jain
> > <shreyansh.jain at nxp.com>
> > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] error in testpmd when CONFIG_RTE_BUILD_SHARED_LIB=y
> > 
> > 2017-04-11 14:02, john miller:
> > >
> > > We are seeing an issue when running from the head of the master branch in
> > dpdk-next-net and building with CONFIG_RTE_BUILD_SHARED_LIB=y.   When we run
> > testpmd using  -d to point to our PMD we get this error
> > >
> > > EAL: Error - exiting with code: 1
> > >   Cause: Creation of mbuf pool for socket 0 failed: Invalid argument
> > >
> > > This error occurs as a result of the rte mempool ops table having 0
> > entries.  This table is populated from a call to rte_mempool_register_ops().
> > This function gets called in rte_mempool_ring.c via the static initialization
> > MACRO MEMPOOL_REGISTER_OPS and exists in librte_mempool_ring.so.  However
> > this library is not loaded when the rte_eal_init() gets called so the static
> > initializers are not yet loaded.
> > >
> > > I am requesting advice on the proper way to repair this.
>  
> "-d" the ring library (rte_mempool_ring) - just like any other shared lib.
> 

I think this is a bug that should be fixed. The user should not need to
have to specify a mempool driver just to get testpmd working, so I think
the ring handler as default should be compiled in automatically so as to
allow regular mempools to just work as before.

> This change was done recently to move ring handler into its separate drivers/mempool/ring directory. That also means it no longer is compiled into the librte_mempool.
> 
> > 
> > We should just add a better error message if no mempool driver is available.
> 
> Yes, that is something to be improved.

This should be fixed by always having a mempool driver installed.

/Bruce


More information about the dev mailing list