[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/3 v2] disable vector PMD for i686

Bruce Richardson bruce.richardson at intel.com
Fri Apr 28 11:26:17 CEST 2017


On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 11:14:24AM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 27/04/2017 11:25, Bruce Richardson:
> > On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 03:01:04AM -0400, Qi Zhang wrote:
> > > Vector PMD is not designed for i686 orginally, but it still can be active
> > > with i686 compile option.
> > > Below are observed failure when vPMD is invovled on i686
> > > (but may not limited to)
> > > 
> > > 1) memory overwrite when assign 2 mbuf points to rx return points.
> > > _mm_storeu_si128((__m128i *)&rx_pkts[pos+2], mbp2)
> > 
> > Is this a serious issue that prevents us using the driver? I think it's been
> > in the code for quite some time. Can it not be relatively easily fixed for
> > 32-bit builds?
> > 
> > > 
> > > 2) rearm_data is not 16 bytes aligned that cause general-protection exception
> > > _mm_store_si128((__m128i *)&rx_pkts[0]->rearm_data, rearm0);
> > > 
> > 
> > Good catch. I think this is also an easy fix. My preferred fix is to
> > explicitly align the rearm data on a 16-byte boundary. It would add some
> > padding to the middle of cacheline0 of the mbuf, but given that we
> > explicitly move other data to cacheline1, we will have padding on 32-bit
> > anyway, be it in the middle or the end of the mbuf cachelines.
> > 
> > > So the patch set will exclude Vector PMD from compile with i686 configure.
> 
> Please try to fix the drivers instead of turning them off.

The patch for alignment of physical addresses should fix these issues,
removing the need for these patches.

/Bruce


More information about the dev mailing list