[dpdk-dev] 答复: Re: [PATCH] app/testpmd:add bond type description

[xie.rongqiang at zte.com.cn]

I am sorry to reply so late for some reason.

And i figure out two ways to implement this kind of things inside the 
bonding code,

First,if can the function rte_eth_bond_mode_get() return string, so we can 
print

the bond mode straight, but in this way, we need fix the other c source 
where call the function. 

Second, we add an interface return bond mode string, in this way, we just 
call it in function

cmd_show_bonding_config_parsed().

Finally, which way do you agree more? 

Looking forward to your early reply,Thank your. 


Thomas Monjalon <thomas at monjalon.net>  2017/07/03 02:11:52:

> :  Thomas Monjalon <thomas at monjalon.net>
> :  Declan Doherty <declan.doherty at intel.com>, 
> : dev at dpdk.org, RongQiang Xie <xie.rongqiang at zte.com.cn>, 
> jingjing.wu at intel.com
> :  2017/07/03 02:12
> : Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] app/testpmd:add bond type description
> 
> 30/06/2017 17:39, Declan Doherty:
> > On 30/06/17 08:56, RongQiang Xie wrote:
> > > In function cmd_show_bonding_config_parsed() used number represent
> > > the bond type,in order more detailed,add bond type description
> > > otherwise we may confused about the number type.
> > > And also,the primary port just use in mode active backup and tlb,
> > > so,when the mode is active backup or tlb show the primary port info
> > > may be more appropriate.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: RongQiang Xie <xie.rongqiang at zte.com.cn>
> > > ---
> > >   app/test-pmd/cmdline.c | 17 +++++++++++------
> > >   1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c b/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c
> > > index ff8ffd2..45845a4 100644
> > > --- a/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c
> > > +++ b/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c
> > > @@ -4390,7 +4390,9 @@ static void cmd_show_bonding_config_parsed
> (void *parsed_result,
> > >         printf("\tFailed to get bonding mode for port = %d\n", 
port_id);
> > >         return;
> > >      } else
> > > -      printf("\tBonding mode: %d\n", bonding_mode);
> > > +      printf("\tBonding mode: %d ", bonding_mode);
> > > +   printf("[0:Round Robin, 1:Active Backup, 2:Balance, 3:Broadcast, 
");
> > > +   printf("\n\t\t\t4:802.3AD, 5:Adaptive TLB, 6:Adaptive Load 
> Balancing]\n");
> > > 
> > 
> > Good idea, but it would be clearer if we just returned the actual mode 

> > string so the user doesn't need to parse it themselves, like below.
> > 
> > -       } else
> > -               printf("\tBonding mode: %d ", bonding_mode);
> > -       printf("[0:Round Robin, 1:Active Backup, 2:Balance, 
3:Broadcast, ");
> > -       printf("\n\t\t\t4:802.3AD, 5:Adaptive TLB, 6:Adaptive Load 
> > Balancing]\n");
> > +       }
> > +
> > +       printf("\tBonding mode: %d (", bonding_mode);
> > +       switch (bonding_mode) {
> > +       case BONDING_MODE_ROUND_ROBIN:
> > +               printf("round-robin");
> > +               break;
> > +       case BONDING_MODE_ACTIVE_BACKUP:
> > +               printf("active-backup");
> > +               break;
> > +       case BONDING_MODE_BALANCE:
> > +               printf("link-aggregation");
> > +               break;
> > +       case BONDING_MODE_BROADCAST:
> > +               printf("broadcast");
> > +               break;
> > +       case BONDING_MODE_8023AD:
> > +               printf("link-aggregation-802.3ad");
> > +               break;
> > +       case BONDING_MODE_TLB:
> > +               printf("transmit-load-balancing");
> > +               break;
> > +       case BONDING_MODE_ALB:
> > +               printf("adaptive-load-balancing");
> > +               break;
> > +       default:
> > +               printf("unknown-mode");
> > +       }
> > +       printf(")\n");
> 
> I would say no.
> Can we think how to implement this kind of things inside the bonding 
code?
> 
>