[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/5] lpm: fix compilation on ARM BE

[Hemant Agrawal]

On 12/13/2017 6:52 PM, Bruce Richardson wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 06:22:55PM +0530, Hemant Agrawal wrote:
>> Compiling on ARM BE using Linaro toolchain caused following
>> error/warnings.
>>
>> rte_lpm.c: In function ‘add_depth_big_v20’:
>> rte_lpm.c:911:4: error: braces around scalar initializer [-Werror]
>>     { .group_idx = (uint8_t)tbl8_group_index, },
>>     ^
>> rte_lpm.c:911:4: note: (near initialization for
>> 	‘new_tbl24_entry.depth’)
>> rte_lpm.c:911:6:error: field name not in record or union initializer
>>     { .group_idx = (uint8_t)tbl8_group_index, },
>>       ^
>> rte_lpm.c:911:6: note: (near initialization for
>> 	‘new_tbl24_entry.depth’)
>> rte_lpm.c:914:13: error: initialized field overwritten
>> 	[-Werror=override-init]
>>     .depth = 0,
>>
>> Fixes: dc81ebbacaeb ("lpm: extend IPv4 next hop field")
>> Cc: Michal Kobylinski <michalx.kobylinski at intel.com>
>> Cc: stable at dpdk.org
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jun Yang <jun.yang at nxp.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Hemant Agrawal <hemant.agrawal at nxp.com>
>> Acked-by: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson at intel.com>
>> ---
>> v2: added endianess check in the assignments
>>
>>  lib/librte_lpm/rte_lpm.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  1 file changed, 29 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/lib/librte_lpm/rte_lpm.c b/lib/librte_lpm/rte_lpm.c
>> index e1f1fad..a47c04f 100644
>> --- a/lib/librte_lpm/rte_lpm.c
>> +++ b/lib/librte_lpm/rte_lpm.c
>> @@ -912,10 +912,17 @@ add_depth_big_v20(struct rte_lpm_v20 *lpm, uint32_t ip_masked, uint8_t depth,
>>  		 */
>>
>>  		struct rte_lpm_tbl_entry_v20 new_tbl24_entry = {
>> +#if RTE_BYTE_ORDER == RTE_LITTLE_ENDIAN
>>  			{ .group_idx = (uint8_t)tbl8_group_index, },
>>  			.valid = VALID,
>>  			.valid_group = 1,
>>  			.depth = 0,
>> +#else
>> +			.depth = 0,
>> +			.valid_group = 1,
>> +			.valid = VALID,
>> +			{ .group_idx = (uint8_t)tbl8_group_index, },
>> +#endif
>>  		};
>>
> I'm not I'd agree with this as a "better" fix. Were the issues with the
> previous version of just removing the braces. All the ifdefs are rather
> ugly.
>
Ok. I will revert.