[dpdk-dev] [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v2] net/mlx5: fix link status query
Adrien Mazarguil
adrien.mazarguil at 6wind.com
Wed Feb 1 10:07:11 CET 2017
On Wed, Feb 01, 2017 at 06:53:55AM +0000, Shahaf Shuler wrote:
> : Tuesday, January 31, 2017 6:17 PM, Ferruh Yigit:
> > On 1/31/2017 11:45 AM, Shahaf Shuler wrote:
> > > Trying to query the link status through new kernel ioctl API
> > > ETHTOOL_GLINKSETTINGS was always failing due to kernel bug.
> > > The bug was fixed on version 4.9
> > > this patch uses the legacy ioctl API for lower kernels.
> > >
> > > Fixes: 188408719888 ("net/mlx5: fix support for newer link speeds")
> > > CC: stable at dpdk.org
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Shahaf Shuler <shahafs at mellanox.com>
> > > ---
> >
> > <...>
> >
> > > @@ -707,7 +708,7 @@ struct priv *
> > > static int
> > > mlx5_link_update_unlocked_gs(struct rte_eth_dev *dev, int
> > > wait_to_complete) { -#ifdef ETHTOOL_GLINKSETTINGS
> > > +#if KERNEL_VERSION(4, 9, 0) <= LINUX_VERSION_CODE
> >
> > Mostly it is not good idea to do kernel version check in the .c file.
> >
> > It is possible to move this comparison to the .h file, and set a feature
> > macro based on comparison result, like HAVE_ETHTOOL_GLINKSETTINGS,
> > and
> > use this macro in the .c file.
> >
> > This makes .c code easier to understand. And the abstraction in the
> > header file lets you update the comparison in the future without
> > changing the code itself.
> >
> > But it is your call, do you prefer to continue with this one?
>
> This is a good suggestion.
> Adrien, Nélio what do you think?
Let's include this patch as-is. Doing so in a header file such as mlx5.h
would require including linux/version.h from that file and cause the entire
PMD to be even more OS-dependent.
We'll move this check elsewhere in the future if we need several such
workarounds, thanks.
> > > struct priv *priv = mlx5_get_priv(dev);
> > > struct ethtool_link_settings edata = {
> > > .cmd = ETHTOOL_GLINKSETTINGS,
> > <...>
--
Adrien Mazarguil
6WIND
More information about the dev
mailing list