[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/5] net/i40e: fix bitmask of supported Tx flags

Wu, Jingjing jingjing.wu at intel.com
Tue Feb 7 03:30:53 CET 2017



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Olivier Matz [mailto:olivier.matz at 6wind.com]
> Sent: Monday, February 6, 2017 6:27 PM
> To: Wu, Jingjing <jingjing.wu at intel.com>
> Cc: dev at dpdk.org; Zhang, Helin <helin.zhang at intel.com>; Ananyev,
> Konstantin <konstantin.ananyev at intel.com>; Yigit, Ferruh
> <ferruh.yigit at intel.com>
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/5] net/i40e: fix bitmask of supported Tx
> flags
> 
> Hi Jingjing,
> 
> On Sat,  4 Feb 2017 11:36:12 +0800, Jingjing Wu <jingjing.wu at intel.com>
> wrote:
> > Some Tx offload flags are missed in bitmask of all supported packet Tx
> > flags by i40e.
> > This patch fixes it.
> 
> Could you detail which flag was missing?
> Is it PKT_TX_TUNNEL_MASK?
> If yes, shouldn't we have a "Fixes:" line?
> 
> I think most of the patchset should be merged in one patch, because
> changing only the mbuf part (PKT_TX_OFFLOAD_MASK) would break the
> drivers that checks the offload bits at init, and this is not suitable, especially if
> we want to be able to do git bisect.
> 
> 
> My suggestion is to have:
> 
> 1- fix i40 (add missing tunnel mask?)
> 2- fix missing MACSET in TX_OFFLOAD_MASK
> 3- change TX_OFFLOAD_MASK to include all flags (this impacts all
>    drivers using TX_OFFLOAD_MASK)
> 
>
OK. Will change according to your suggestion. It's clearer. Thanks

Jingjing


More information about the dev mailing list