[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 5/6] lib: added new library for latency stats
jerin.jacob at caviumnetworks.com
Tue Jan 17 08:35:43 CET 2017
On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 06:48:30AM +0000, Remy Horton wrote:
> On 17/01/2017 04:29, Jerin Jacob wrote:
> > It is a value added feature for DPDK. But what is the plan for incorporating
> > the mbuf change? I have 8 month old mbuf change for ARM for natural
> > alignment. If we are accepting any mbuf change then we need to include
> > outstanding mbuf changes to avoid future ABI breakage.
> > http://dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/12878/
> I know there's some discussion going on in the background regarding this.
> I've yet to hear a definite answer myself..
This was the last thread on this topic
Where Oliver want to group a few of the mbuf changes together.
Thats is good. But, looking at the history(holding a ARM specific patch for 8
months), I don't believe, we will get consensus on _all_ the items on
mbuf change like ports, m->next etc.
I think we had consensus on my change(making mbuf natural
aligned), but it was queued for grouping with other mbuf changes.
More information about the dev