[dpdk-dev] [PATCHv5 05/33] bus/fslmc: introduce mc object functions
hemant.agrawal at nxp.com
Fri Jan 20 05:52:07 CET 2017
On 1/20/2017 12:40 AM, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
> On 1/19/2017 1:23 PM, Hemant Agrawal wrote:
>> This patch intoduces the DPAA2 MC(Management complex Driver).
>> This is a minimal set of low level functions to send and
>> receive commands to the fsl-mc. It includes support for basic
>> management commands and commands to manipulate MC objects.
>> This is common to be used by various DPAA2 PMDs. e.g.net, crypto
>> and other drivers.
>> This is a low level library also used in kernel.
>> Signed-off-by: Cristian Sovaiala <cristian.sovaiala at nxp.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Hemant Agrawal <hemant.agrawal at nxp.com>
>> diff --git a/drivers/bus/fslmc/mc/fsl_mc_cmd.h b/drivers/bus/fslmc/mc/fsl_mc_cmd.h
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..cbd3995
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/drivers/bus/fslmc/mc/fsl_mc_cmd.h
>> @@ -0,0 +1,231 @@
>> +/* Copyright 2013-2016 Freescale Semiconductor Inc.
>> + * Copyright (c) 2016 NXP.
>> + *
>> + * Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
>> + * modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are met:
>> + * * Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright
>> + * notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
>> + * * Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright
>> + * notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in the
>> + * documentation and/or other materials provided with the distribution.
>> + * * Neither the name of the above-listed copyright holders nor the
>> + * names of any contributors may be used to endorse or promote products
>> + * derived from this software without specific prior written permission.
>> + *
>> + *
>> + * ALTERNATIVELY, this software may be distributed under the terms of the
>> + * GNU General Public License ("GPL") as published by the Free Software
>> + * Foundation, either version 2 of that License or (at your option) any
>> + * later version.
> Dual licensed, GPL and BSD ?
This is new code. We are submitting same file to Uboot/UEFI and kernel.
That is the reason, we added dual license.
In Userspace - only BSD license is applicable?
Is that a issue?
>> + *
>> + * THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND CONTRIBUTORS "AS IS"
>> + * AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE
>> + * IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE
>> + * ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS OR CONTRIBUTORS BE
>> + * LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR
>> + * CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF
>> + * SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE, DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS
>> + * INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN
>> + * CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE)
>> + * ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE
>> + * POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
>> + */
More information about the dev