[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4] ethdev: fix MAC address replay
Ferruh Yigit
ferruh.yigit at intel.com
Tue Jan 24 14:21:39 CET 2017
On 1/24/2017 10:09 AM, Igor Ryzhov wrote:
> Thank you Steve.
>
> I never did it before and I don't know if I have rights for that, but:
>
> Acked-by: Igor Ryzhov <iryzhov at nfware.com <mailto:iryzhov at nfware.com>>
Unrelated to the patch itself, but since it has been mentioned, let me
share what I know, I believe Thomas or others will correct me if I am wrong:
- Everyone can Ack.
And this is useful information for maintainers, so it is something
good when more people review and ack. Please do.
- Multiple ack or review is better.
- But each Ack does not have same weight, maintainer decides on this
weight, based on contribution of the person who ack'ed.
- There is slight difference between Acked-by and Reviewed-by:
-- Acked-by: Kind of asking for patch to be applied, saying this patch
is good and please get it.
-- Reviewed-by: Saying I have done the review at my best and patch looks
good to me.
Acked-by has slightly more responsibility than Reviewed-by.
If you are not maintainer of that field, and not have strong opinion
about that patch to be merged, it is possible to prefer Reviewed-by
against Acked-by.
But overall both are good, and definitely better than not saying
anything at all.
Thanks,
ferruh
>
> On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 5:21 AM, Steve Shin <jonshin at cisco.com
> <mailto:jonshin at cisco.com>> wrote:
>
> This patch fixes a bug in replaying MAC address to the hardware
> in rte_eth_dev_config_restore() routine. Added default MAC replay as
> well.
>
> Fixes: 4bdefaade6d1 ("ethdev: VMDQ enhancements")
>
> ---
> v2: Added default MAC replay & Code optimization
> v3: Covered a case (ex, SR-IOV) where multiple pools
> exist in the mac_pool_sel array.
> v4: removed a coding style warning
>
> Signed-off-by: Steve Shin <jonshin at cisco.com <mailto:jonshin at cisco.com>>
>
More information about the dev
mailing list