[dpdk-dev] ixgbe: link status for PF up/down is not updating using LSI DPDK16.11.1 Sample App
Shashikant Poonia
shashikantpoonia89 at gmail.com
Fri Jun 2 07:07:22 CEST 2017
Hi all, Anybody got a chance to look into ?
BTW, am using below two patches for VF reset on DPDK 16.11
http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2016-June/040287.html ::lib/librte_ether:
support device reset
http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2016-June/040290.html
<http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2016-June/040289.html> ::ixgbe: implement
device reset on VF
Having few queries based above patches.
1) Are above patches are sufficient to reset VF ? Along with 2 patches, do
we need to have more fix ?
2) May know, Why above patches are not submitted, Were there any side
effect of both patches ?
3) Is the patch applicable to DPDK 2.1 also along with mailbox process
patch ?
4) Is there any plan to submit above fixes in latest dpdk code ?
Awaiting for the reply .. Thanks in advance.
On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 6:41 PM, Shashikant Poonia <
shashikantpoonia89 at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
>
> I am running Link Status Interrupt(LSI) DPDK sample application to test
> link status by making PF up/down using 'ip link set dev <intface>
> up/down'. I would think, it should trigger 'ixgbe_dev_interrupt_handler()'
> when we do interface up/down. But looks like it is not triggered
> 'ixgbe_dev_interrupt_handler()' to update link status.
>
>
> setup details:
>
> DPDK 16.11.1 LSI sample application
> Host: rhel 7.2 having Intel X540 10G card
> Guest: KVM hypervisor attached VFs
>
> Execute LSI binary on Guest using
> ./link_status_interrupt -c 2 -n 4 -- -q 2 -p 0x3
>
> My main goal to check the link status of VF's on Guest machine, but looks
> like its not updated on PF itself. So once this works then i hope it works
> for VF as well
>
> Please do let me know, whether i am missing any configuraion/patch ? Any
> help would be appreciated
>
>
>
> --
> Regards,
> Shashikant Poonia
>
--
Regards,
Shashikant Poonia
More information about the dev
mailing list