[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/7] net/bnxt: fix mtu configuration for the function
Ferruh Yigit
ferruh.yigit at intel.com
Thu Jun 29 12:55:59 CEST 2017
On 6/29/2017 3:51 AM, Ajit Khaparde wrote:
> Set the MTU of the device to MAX size possible.
What was the failure with existing code?
> Signed-off-by: Ajit Khaparde <ajit.khaparde at broadcom.com>
Can you please add the Fixes tag.
> ---
> drivers/net/bnxt/bnxt_hwrm.c | 3 +--
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/bnxt/bnxt_hwrm.c b/drivers/net/bnxt/bnxt_hwrm.c
> index e237041..580b2d8 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/bnxt/bnxt_hwrm.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/bnxt/bnxt_hwrm.c
> @@ -2023,8 +2023,7 @@ static int bnxt_hwrm_pf_func_cfg(struct bnxt *bp, int tx_rings)
> HWRM_FUNC_CFG_INPUT_ENABLES_NUM_VNICS |
> HWRM_FUNC_CFG_INPUT_ENABLES_NUM_HW_RING_GRPS);
> req.flags = rte_cpu_to_le_32(bp->pf.func_cfg_flags);
> - req.mtu = rte_cpu_to_le_16(bp->eth_dev->data->mtu + ETHER_HDR_LEN +
> - ETHER_CRC_LEN + VLAN_TAG_SIZE);
> + req.mtu = rte_cpu_to_le_16(BNXT_MAX_MTU);
Just question, would this cause larger frames than expected in application?
> req.mru = rte_cpu_to_le_16(bp->eth_dev->data->mtu + ETHER_HDR_LEN +
> ETHER_CRC_LEN + VLAN_TAG_SIZE);
> req.num_rsscos_ctxs = rte_cpu_to_le_16(bp->max_rsscos_ctx);
>
More information about the dev
mailing list