[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/7] net/bnxt: fix mtu configuration for the function

Ferruh Yigit ferruh.yigit at intel.com
Thu Jun 29 12:55:59 CEST 2017


On 6/29/2017 3:51 AM, Ajit Khaparde wrote:
> Set the MTU of the device to MAX size possible.

What was the failure with existing code?

> Signed-off-by: Ajit Khaparde <ajit.khaparde at broadcom.com>

Can you please add the Fixes tag.

> ---
>  drivers/net/bnxt/bnxt_hwrm.c | 3 +--
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/bnxt/bnxt_hwrm.c b/drivers/net/bnxt/bnxt_hwrm.c
> index e237041..580b2d8 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/bnxt/bnxt_hwrm.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/bnxt/bnxt_hwrm.c
> @@ -2023,8 +2023,7 @@ static int bnxt_hwrm_pf_func_cfg(struct bnxt *bp, int tx_rings)
>  			HWRM_FUNC_CFG_INPUT_ENABLES_NUM_VNICS |
>  			HWRM_FUNC_CFG_INPUT_ENABLES_NUM_HW_RING_GRPS);
>  	req.flags = rte_cpu_to_le_32(bp->pf.func_cfg_flags);
> -	req.mtu = rte_cpu_to_le_16(bp->eth_dev->data->mtu + ETHER_HDR_LEN +
> -				   ETHER_CRC_LEN + VLAN_TAG_SIZE);
> +	req.mtu = rte_cpu_to_le_16(BNXT_MAX_MTU);

Just question, would this cause larger frames than expected in application?

>  	req.mru = rte_cpu_to_le_16(bp->eth_dev->data->mtu + ETHER_HDR_LEN +
>  				   ETHER_CRC_LEN + VLAN_TAG_SIZE);
>  	req.num_rsscos_ctxs = rte_cpu_to_le_16(bp->max_rsscos_ctx);
> 



More information about the dev mailing list