[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 09/18] lib: add symbol versioning to distributor

Van Haaren, Harry harry.van.haaren at intel.com
Mon Mar 13 12:01:13 CET 2017


> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Hunt, David
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 09/18] lib: add symbol versioning to distributor
> 
> On 10/3/2017 4:22 PM, Bruce Richardson wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 09:10:24AM +0000, David Hunt wrote:
> >> Also bumped up the ABI version number in the Makefile
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: David Hunt <david.hunt at intel.com>
> >> ---
> >>   lib/librte_distributor/Makefile                    |  2 +-
> >>   lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.c           | 57 +++++++++++---
> >>   lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor_v1705.h     | 89 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> > A file named rte_distributor_v1705.h was added in patch 4, then deleted
> > in patch 7, and now added again here. Seems a lot of churn.
> >
> > /Bruce
> >
> 
> The first introduction of this file is what will become the public
> header. For successful compilation,
> this cannot be called rte_distributor.h until the symbol versioning
> patch, at which stage I will
> rename the file, and introduce the symbol versioned header at the same
> time. In the next patch
> I'll rename this version of the files as rte_distributor_public.h to
> make this clearer.


Suggestion to use rte_distributor_next.h instead of public?
Public doesn't indicate if its old or new, while next would make that clearer IMO :)


More information about the dev mailing list