[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 02/12] crypto/dpaa2_sec: add dpaa2 sec poll mode driver

Akhil Goyal akhil.goyal at nxp.com
Wed Mar 22 09:39:15 CET 2017


On 3/21/2017 8:37 PM, De Lara Guarch, Pablo wrote:
> Hi Akhil,
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Akhil Goyal [mailto:akhil.goyal at nxp.com]
>> Sent: Friday, March 03, 2017 7:49 PM
>> To: dev at dpdk.org
>> Cc: thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com; Doherty, Declan; De Lara Guarch, Pablo;
>> Mcnamara, John; nhorman at tuxdriver.com; hemant.agrawal at nxp.com;
>> Akhil Goyal
>> Subject: [PATCH v5 02/12] crypto/dpaa2_sec: add dpaa2 sec poll mode
>> driver
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Hemant Agrawal <hemant.agrawal at nxp.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Akhil Goyal <akhil.goyal at nxp.com>
>
> ...
>
>> diff --git a/config/defconfig_arm64-dpaa2-linuxapp-gcc
>> b/config/defconfig_arm64-dpaa2-linuxapp-gcc
>> index 29a56c7..50ba0d6 100644
>> --- a/config/defconfig_arm64-dpaa2-linuxapp-gcc
>> +++ b/config/defconfig_arm64-dpaa2-linuxapp-gcc
>> @@ -65,3 +65,15 @@ CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_DPAA2_DEBUG_DRIVER=n
>>  CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_DPAA2_DEBUG_RX=n
>>  CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_DPAA2_DEBUG_TX=n
>>  CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_DPAA2_DEBUG_TX_FREE=n
>> +
>> +#Compile NXP DPAA2 crypto sec driver for CAAM HW
>> +CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_PMD_DPAA2_SEC=y
>> +CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_DPAA2_SEC_DEBUG_INIT=n
>> +CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_DPAA2_SEC_DEBUG_DRIVER=n
>> +CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_DPAA2_SEC_DEBUG_RX=n
>> +
>> +#
>> +# Number of sessions to create in the session memory pool
>> +# on a single DPAA2 SEC device.
>> +#
>> +CONFIG_RTE_DPAA2_SEC_PMD_MAX_NB_SESSIONS=2048
>> diff --git a/drivers/bus/Makefile b/drivers/bus/Makefile
>> index 8f7864b..3ef7f2e 100644
>> --- a/drivers/bus/Makefile
>> +++ b/drivers/bus/Makefile
>> @@ -32,6 +32,9 @@
>>  include $(RTE_SDK)/mk/rte.vars.mk
>>
>>  CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_FSLMC_BUS = $(CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_DPAA2_PMD)
>> +ifneq ($(CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_FSLMC_BUS),y)
>> +CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_FSLMC_BUS =
>> $(CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_PMD_DPAA2_SEC)
>
> I assume that this patchset sits on top of the dpaa2 network driver.
> With that one applied, there is a conflict here.
> Could you rebase this patch against that one and submit a v6?
>
> Thanks!
> Pablo
>
>
Hi Pablo,

Thanks for reviewing the patchset. I would send the next version pretty soon

-Akhil



More information about the dev mailing list