[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6] net/i40e: improved FDIR programming times
Ferruh Yigit
ferruh.yigit at intel.com
Wed May 17 16:10:22 CEST 2017
On 5/17/2017 2:45 PM, Michael Lilja wrote:
> Previously, the FDIR programming time is +11ms on i40e.
> This patch will result in an average programming time of
> 22usec with a max of 60usec .
>
> Signed-off-by: Michael Lilja <ml at napatech.com>
Please cc maintainers in the patch.
>
> ---
> v6:
> * Fixed code style issues
>
> v5:
> * Reinitialization of "i" inconsistent with original intent
>
> v4:
> * Code style fix
>
> v3:
> * Replaced commit message
>
> v2:
> * Code style fix
>
> v1:
> * Initial version
> ---
> ---
> drivers/net/i40e/i40e_fdir.c | 26 +++++++++++++-------------
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_fdir.c b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_fdir.c
> index 28cc554f5..16cb963ce 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_fdir.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_fdir.c
> @@ -1295,28 +1295,28 @@ i40e_fdir_filter_programming(struct i40e_pf *pf,
> /* Update the tx tail register */
> rte_wmb();
> I40E_PCI_REG_WRITE(txq->qtx_tail, txq->tx_tail);
> -
> - for (i = 0; i < I40E_FDIR_WAIT_COUNT; i++) {
> - rte_delay_us(I40E_FDIR_WAIT_INTERVAL_US);
> + i = 0;
This is extracted out of "for" to stay in 80 columns limit, but instead
what do you think:
Create a variable, something like "wait_us_count":
wait_us_count = I40E_FDIR_WAIT_COUNT * I40E_FDIR_WAIT_INTERVAL_US;
and used it below three times, and lines will stay in limit.
> + for (; i < (I40E_FDIR_WAIT_COUNT * I40E_FDIR_WAIT_INTERVAL_US); i++) {
> if ((txdp->cmd_type_offset_bsz &
> - rte_cpu_to_le_64(I40E_TXD_QW1_DTYPE_MASK)) ==
> - rte_cpu_to_le_64(I40E_TX_DESC_DTYPE_DESC_DONE))
> + rte_cpu_to_le_64(I40E_TXD_QW1_DTYPE_MASK)) ==
> + rte_cpu_to_le_64(I40E_TX_DESC_DTYPE_DESC_DONE))
Old indentation was correct I think, that is to differentiate the code
in below line easily.
> break;
> + rte_delay_us(1);
> }
> - if (i >= I40E_FDIR_WAIT_COUNT) {
> + if (i >= (I40E_FDIR_WAIT_COUNT * I40E_FDIR_WAIT_INTERVAL_US)) {
> PMD_DRV_LOG(ERR, "Failed to program FDIR filter:"
> " time out to get DD on tx queue.");
> return -ETIMEDOUT;
> }
> /* totally delay 10 ms to check programming status*/
> - rte_delay_us((I40E_FDIR_WAIT_COUNT - i) * I40E_FDIR_WAIT_INTERVAL_US);
> - if (i40e_check_fdir_programming_status(rxq) < 0) {
> - PMD_DRV_LOG(ERR, "Failed to program FDIR filter:"
> - " programming status reported.");
> - return -ENOSYS;
> + for (; i < (I40E_FDIR_WAIT_COUNT * I40E_FDIR_WAIT_INTERVAL_US); i++) {
> + if (i40e_check_fdir_programming_status(rxq) >= 0)
> + return 0;
> + rte_delay_us(1);
> }
> -
> - return 0;
> + PMD_DRV_LOG(ERR, "Failed to program FDIR filter:"
> + " programming status reported.");
> + return -ETIMEDOUT;
> }
>
> /*
>
More information about the dev
mailing list