[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8] net/i40e: improved FDIR programming times

[Michael Lilja]

Please fix while applying.

-----Original Message-----
From: Ferruh Yigit [mailto:ferruh.yigit at intel.com] 
Sent: 17 May 2017 17:17
To: Michael Lilja <ml at napatech.com>; helin.zhang at intel.com; jingjing.wu at intel.com
Cc: dev at dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8] net/i40e: improved FDIR programming times

On 5/17/2017 3:57 PM, Michael Lilja wrote:
> Previously, the FDIR programming time is +11ms on i40e.
> This patch will result in an average programming time of 22usec with a 
> max of 60usec .
> 
> Signed-off-by: Michael Lilja <ml at napatech.com>

<...>

>  	/* totally delay 10 ms to check programming status*/
> -	rte_delay_us((I40E_FDIR_WAIT_COUNT - i) * I40E_FDIR_WAIT_INTERVAL_US);
> -	if (i40e_check_fdir_programming_status(rxq) < 0) {
> -		PMD_DRV_LOG(ERR, "Failed to program FDIR filter:"
> -			    " programming status reported.");
> -		return -ENOSYS;
> +	for (; i < I40E_FDIR_MAX_WAIT_US; i++) {
> +		if (i40e_check_fdir_programming_status(rxq) >= 0)
> +			return 0;
> +		rte_delay_us(1);
>  	}
> -
> -	return 0;
> +	PMD_DRV_LOG(ERR, "Failed to program FDIR filter:"
> +		" programming status reported."
I am aware that you just moved this log, but since you have touched to it, can you please fix it too [1]:

PMD_DRV_LOG(ERR,
	"Failed to program FDIR filter: programming status reported.");

[1] Or if you prefer please let me know, so I can fix it while applying.

> +	return -ETIMEDOUT;
>  }
>  
>  /*
>