[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] vhost: support rx_queue_count

[Yuanhan Liu]

On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 10:36:01AM +0200, Jens Freimann wrote:
> On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 04:14:19PM +0800, Yuanhan Liu wrote:
> > On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 12:51:56PM +0000, Wang, Zhihong wrote:
> > > 
> > > 
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Jens Freimann [mailto:jfreiman at redhat.com]
> > > > Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2017 7:54 PM
> > > > To: Wang, Zhihong <zhihong.wang at intel.com>
> > > > Cc: dev at dpdk.org; yuanhan.liu at linux.intel.com
> > > > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] vhost: support rx_queue_count
> > > > 
> > > > On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 04:01:08PM -0400, Zhihong Wang wrote:
> > > > > This patch implements the ops rx_queue_count for vhost PMD by adding
> > > > > a helper function rte_vhost_rx_queue_count in vhost lib.
> > > > >
> > > > > The ops ops rx_queue_count gets vhost RX queue avail count and helps
> > > > 
> > > > s/ops ops/ops/ ?
> > > 
> > > Thanks a lot!
> > 
> > Seems you overlooked other comments, such as:
> > 
> > > > > +	vq = dev->virtqueue[qid];
> > > > 
> > > > check for vq == NULL?
> > > > 
> > > > regards,
> > > > Jens
> > 
> > Besides, Jens, I'm not a big fan of "dev == NULL" over "!dev". I accept
> > both :)
> 
> Personally I'm with you on this, but it says different in http://dpdk.org/doc/guides/contributing/coding_style.html
> Anyway, up to you :)

Yes, I know that. To make every body happy, I would suggset you to
follow the coding style. But if you have already choosen another way,
I won't bother to ask you do the change. Unless, it becomes a must
in future.

	--yliu