[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] mbuf: cleanup rte_pktmbuf_lastseg(), fix atomic usage

[Olivier MATZ]

On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 01:32:13PM +0400, Ilya Matveychikov wrote:
> 
> > On Nov 16, 2017, at 1:06 PM, Hanoch Haim (hhaim) <hhaim at cisco.com> wrote:
> > 
> > Understood 
> > 
> > rte_mbuf_refcnt_update_blind() 
> > 
> > should be good., it will take care the RTE_MBUF_REFCNT_ATOMIC 
> > 
> 
> 
> Why guys not to add just __rte_mbuf_refcnt_update() as a wrapper over
> rte_atomic16_add_return() and use it in inside rte_mbuf_refcnt_update() and
> rte_pktmbuf_prefree_seg() as well?
> 

Is there any other difference with rte_mbuf_refcnt_update_blind() except
the function name?