[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/2] add inline protocol support
Nelio Laranjeiro
nelio.laranjeiro at 6wind.com
Wed Nov 22 16:25:58 CET 2017
On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 08:43:29PM +0530, Anoob wrote:
> Hi Nelio,
>
> The issue is probably because of a different patch titled, "[PATCH 2/3]
> crypto: fix pedentic compilation errors". I was able to reproduce the
> issue with that.
>
> Hope this helps.
>
> Thanks,
> Anoob
Hi Anoob,
Indeed, and I am the author for this one, I've tested your series on top
of the it by replacing the RTE_STD_C11 by __extentsion__ which fixes the
pedantic compilation also, I don't have anymore the segfault.
Thanks and sorry for this,
> On 11/22/2017 06:35 PM, Nelio Laranjeiro wrote:
>
> On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 06:25:12PM +0530, Anoob wrote:
>
> Hi Nelio,
>
> Which mode was attempted when you got the crash? Is it with inline-protocol?
>
> Hi Annoob,
>
> Yes, MLX5 ConnectX-4 Lx INNOVA is an inline crypto NIC.
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Anoob
>
>
> On 11/22/2017 05:51 PM, Nelio Laranjeiro wrote:
>
> Hi Anoob,
>
> I am facing a segfault in ipsec-secgw with this series when using MLX5
> PMD, maybe you can help here, see the following gdb backtrace.
>
> Thread 1 "ipsec-secgw" received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
> 0x00005555555b5123 in __rte_security_attach_session (sym_op=0x0, sess=0x7ffef7edb540) at /root/dpdk/x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc/include/rte_security.h:378
> 378 sym_op->sec_session = sess;
> (gdb) bt
> #0 0x00005555555b5123 in __rte_security_attach_session (sym_op=0x0, sess=0x7ffef7edb540) at /root/dpdk/x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc/include/rte_security.h:378
> #1 0x00005555555b5178 in rte_security_attach_session (op=0x7fffe8a90008, sess=0x7ffef7edb540) at /root/dpdk/x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc/include/rte_security.h:414
> #2 0x00005555555b6389 in ipsec_enqueue (xform_func=0x5555555b7961 <esp_inbound>, ipsec_ctx=0x555556003a00 <lcore_conf+1689984>, pkts=0x7fffffffdaf0, sas=0x7fffffffd830,
> nb_pkts=1) at /root/dpdk/examples/ipsec-secgw/ipsec.c:449
> #3 0x00005555555b68f5 in ipsec_inbound (ctx=0x555556003a00 <lcore_conf+1689984>, pkts=0x7fffffffdaf0, nb_pkts=1, len=32) at /root/dpdk/examples/ipsec-secgw/ipsec.c:542
> #4 0x00005555555c3713 in process_pkts_inbound (ipsec_ctx=0x555556003a00 <lcore_conf+1689984>, traffic=0x7fffffffd8f0) at /root/dpdk/examples/ipsec-secgw/ipsec-secgw.c:465
> #5 0x00005555555c42eb in process_pkts (qconf=0x555556001480 <lcore_conf+1680384>, pkts=0x7fffffffe830, nb_pkts=1 '\001', portid=0)
> at /root/dpdk/examples/ipsec-secgw/ipsec-secgw.c:699
> #6 0x00005555555c47eb in main_loop (dummy=0x0) at /root/dpdk/examples/ipsec-secgw/ipsec-secgw.c:792
> #7 0x00005555556301c5 in rte_eal_mp_remote_launch (f=0x5555555c43e8 <main_loop>, arg=0x0, call_master=CALL_MASTER) at /root/dpdk/lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_launch.c:91
> #8 0x00005555555c65a3 in main (argc=8, argv=0x7fffffffeb18) at /root/dpdk/examples/ipsec-secgw/ipsec-secgw.c:1608
>
> Thanks,
--
Nélio Laranjeiro
6WIND
More information about the dev
mailing list