[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 00/10] fix compilation with -Og
olivier.matz at 6wind.com
Fri Oct 6 09:31:04 CEST 2017
On Fri, Oct 06, 2017 at 01:26:17AM +0100, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
> On 9/11/2017 4:13 PM, Olivier Matz wrote:
> > In developer mode (RTE_DEVEL_BUILD=y) where -Werror is passed in the
> > CFLAGS, the compilation fails with gcc-6.3.0 and EXTRA_CFLAGS=-Og. Some
> > errors are real bugs (but not critical), while some are false positives
> > (gcc bugs?).
> > The solution often consists in initializing a local variable to
> > ensure the compiler won't complain.
> > The patchset contains all the fixes needed to properly compile with -Og.
> > Feedback is welcome to decide if:
> > 1/ we include all of them, even if some are workarounds for
> > gcc bugs
> > 2/ we only include the real fixes, without fixing the compilation with
> > -Og.
> > Olivier Matz (10):
> > net/bnxt: fix compilation with -Og
> > net/qede: fix compilation with -Og
> > net/virtio: fix compilation with -Og
> > net/i40e: fix compilation with -Og
> > uio: fix compilation with -Og
> > cmdline: fix compilation with -Og
> > metrics: fix compilation with -Og
> > lpm6: fix compilation with -Og
> > app/test-crypto-perf: fix memory leak
> > app/test-crypto-perf: fix compilation with -Og
> Series applied to dpdk-next-net/master, thanks.
> Except 3/10, 4/10, 8/10. Normally we don't get partial sets, that makes
> life harder for everyone, but since mentioned ones requires some more
> input I didn't want to make rest wait.
> When those three concluded would you mind sending another set for them?
Sure, will do as soon as we have the feedback
More information about the dev