[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] l3fwd-acl: fix unchecked return value

Kozak, KubaX kubax.kozak at intel.com
Wed Oct 11 08:58:04 CEST 2017


Thanks Zhiyong,

Should I correct this patch and resend to dpdk or is it just a suggestion for future?

Regards,
Kuba

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Yang, Zhiyong
>Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2017 08:56
>To: Kozak, KubaX <kubax.kozak at intel.com>; Ananyev, Konstantin <konstantin.ananyev at intel.com>
>Cc: dev at dpdk.org; Kozak, KubaX <kubax.kozak at intel.com>; stable at dpdk.org
>Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] l3fwd-acl: fix unchecked return value
>
>Hi,kubax,
>
>When you form the patch , you should add v2 and changes in v2.
>Besides that,  please be free to add
>Acked-by: zhiyong yang<zhiyong.yang at intel.com>
>
>Thanks
>Zhiyong
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Kuba Kozak
>> Sent: Tuesday, October 3, 2017 7:48 PM
>> To: Ananyev, Konstantin <konstantin.ananyev at intel.com>
>> Cc: dev at dpdk.org; Kozak, KubaX <kubax.kozak at intel.com>; stable at dpdk.org
>> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] l3fwd-acl: fix unchecked return value
>>
>> Add return value check and error handling for fseek call.
>>
>> Coverity issue: 143435
>> Fixes: 361b2e9559fc ("acl: new sample l3fwd-acl")
>> Cc: konstantin.ananyev at intel.com
>> Cc: stable at dpdk.org
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Kuba Kozak <kubax.kozak at intel.com>
>> Acked-by: Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.ananyev at intel.com>
>> ---


More information about the dev mailing list