[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] eal: change init macro as exec environment specific
Thomas Monjalon
thomas at monjalon.net
Wed Oct 11 15:02:51 CEST 2017
07/08/2017 14:04, Jerin Jacob:
> baremetal execution environments may have a different
> method to enable RTE_INIT instead of using compiler
> constructor scheme. Move RTE_INIT* definition under
> exec-env to support different execution environments.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jerin Jacob <jerin.jacob at caviumnetworks.com>
> ---
> app/test-eventdev/evt_test.h | 2 +-
> lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/eal/Makefile | 2 +-
> .../bsdapp/eal/include/exec-env/rte_eal.h | 51 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_log.c | 2 +
> lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_bus.h | 2 +
> lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_eal.h | 6 ---
> lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_tailq.h | 2 +
> lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/Makefile | 2 +-
> .../linuxapp/eal/include/exec-env/rte_eal.h | 51 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> 9 files changed, 111 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/eal/include/exec-env/rte_eal.h
> create mode 100644 lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/include/exec-env/rte_eal.h
I am not a big fan of duplicating code for Linux and BSD.
Maybe we should have different splits and include a common file
in Linux and BSD?
I feel it would be easier to think about the split when adding
a new environment.
It is also an open question whether we want to support (again) some
bare metal environments.
More information about the dev
mailing list