[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] examples/performance-thread: fix out-of-bounds read

[Jastrzebski, MichalX K]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Jastrzebski,
> MichalX K
> Sent: Monday, October 2, 2017 4:08 PM
> To: Mrozowicz, SlawomirX <slawomirx.mrozowicz at intel.com>; Mcnamara,
> John <john.mcnamara at intel.com>
> Cc: dev at dpdk.org; Mrozowicz, SlawomirX
> <slawomirx.mrozowicz at intel.com>; ian.betts at intel.com; stable at dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] examples/performance-thread: fix out-of-
> bounds read
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Slawomir
> > Mrozowicz
> > Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2017 9:48 AM
> > To: Mcnamara, John <john.mcnamara at intel.com>
> > Cc: dev at dpdk.org; Mrozowicz, SlawomirX
> > <slawomirx.mrozowicz at intel.com>; ian.betts at intel.com;
> stable at dpdk.org
> > Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] examples/performance-thread: fix out-of-
> > bounds read
> >
> > Overrunning array schedcore of 128 8-byte elements at element index
> 128
> > using index lcore_id.
> > Fixed by correct check index lcoreid condition and
> > change type of lcoreid to unsigned.
> >
> > Coverity issue: 143459
> > Fixes: 116819b9ed0d ("examples/performance-thread: add lthread
> > subsystem")
> > Cc: ian.betts at intel.com
> > Cc: stable at dpdk.org
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Slawomir Mrozowicz <slawomirx.mrozowicz at intel.com>
> > ---
> >  examples/performance-thread/common/lthread.h       |  2 +-
> >  examples/performance-thread/common/lthread_sched.c | 11 +++++++--
> --
> >  2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/examples/performance-thread/common/lthread.h
> > b/examples/performance-thread/common/lthread.h
> > index 5c2c1a5f0..0cde5919b 100644
> > --- a/examples/performance-thread/common/lthread.h
> > +++ b/examples/performance-thread/common/lthread.h
> > @@ -87,7 +87,7 @@ int _lthread_desched_sleep(struct lthread *lt);
> >
> >  void _lthread_free(struct lthread *lt);
> >
> > -struct lthread_sched *_lthread_sched_get(int lcore_id);
> > +struct lthread_sched *_lthread_sched_get(unsigned int lcore_id);
> >
> >  struct lthread_stack *_stack_alloc(void);
> >
> > diff --git a/examples/performance-thread/common/lthread_sched.c
> > b/examples/performance-thread/common/lthread_sched.c
> > index 98291478e..3484387b4 100644
> > --- a/examples/performance-thread/common/lthread_sched.c
> > +++ b/examples/performance-thread/common/lthread_sched.c
> > @@ -562,11 +562,14 @@ void lthread_run(void)
> >   * Return the scheduler for this lcore
> >   *
> >   */
> > -struct lthread_sched *_lthread_sched_get(int lcore_id)
> > +struct lthread_sched *_lthread_sched_get(unsigned int lcore_id)
> >  {
> > -	if (lcore_id > LTHREAD_MAX_LCORES)
> > -		return NULL;
> > -	return schedcore[lcore_id];
> > +	struct lthread_sched *res = NULL;
> > +
> > +	if (lcore_id < LTHREAD_MAX_LCORES)
> > +		res = schedcore[lcore_id];
> > +
> > +	return res;
> >  }
> >
> >  /*
> > --
> > 2.11.0
> 
> Hi John,
> Here are four fixes for coverity issues in lthread code:
> http://dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/28979/
> http://dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/28977/
> http://dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/28976/
> http://dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/28975/
> 
> I would like to ask for Your feedback about these fix proposals.
> If everything is ok with them, please send acked-by.
> 
> Best regards
> Michal.

Acked-by: Michal Jastrzebski <michalx.k.jastrzebski at intel.com>