[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] igb_uio: revert open and release operations

Ferruh Yigit ferruh.yigit at intel.com
Fri Oct 20 18:32:04 CEST 2017


On 10/20/2017 8:26 AM, Tan, Jianfeng wrote:
> Hi Ferruh & Harish,
> 
> 
> On 10/20/2017 9:15 AM, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
>> On 10/19/2017 3:43 PM, Patil, Harish wrote:
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Harish Patil <Harish.Patil at cavium.com>
>>> Date: Tuesday, October 17, 2017 at 9:50 PM
>>> To: Thomas Monjalon <thomas at monjalon.net>, Ferruh Yigit
>>> <ferruh.yigit at intel.com>
>>> Cc: "dev at dpdk.org" <dev at dpdk.org>, Jianfeng Tan <jianfeng.tan at intel.com>,
>>> Jingjing Wu <jingjing.wu at intel.com>, "Thotton, Shijith"
>>> <Shijith.Thotton at cavium.com>, Gregory Etelson <gregory at weka.io>, George
>>> Prekas <george.prekas at epfl.ch>, "stable at dpdk.org" <stable at dpdk.org>
>>> Subject: Re: [PATCH] igb_uio: revert open and release operations
>>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas at monjalon.net>
>>>> Date: Tuesday, October 17, 2017 at 1:33 PM
>>>> To: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit at intel.com>, Harish Patil
>>>> <Harish.Patil at cavium.com>
>>>> Cc: "dev at dpdk.org" <dev at dpdk.org>, Jianfeng Tan <jianfeng.tan at intel.com>,
>>>> Jingjing Wu <jingjing.wu at intel.com>, "Thotton, Shijith"
>>>> <Shijith.Thotton at cavium.com>, Gregory Etelson <gregory at weka.io>, George
>>>> Prekas <george.prekas at epfl.ch>, "stable at dpdk.org" <stable at dpdk.org>
>>>> Subject: Re: [PATCH] igb_uio: revert open and release operations
>>>>
>>>>> 17/10/2017 22:14, Ferruh Yigit:
>>>>>> There were bug reports about terminated application may leave device in
>>>>>> undesired state:
>>>>>> http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2016-November/049745.html
>>>>>> http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2016-November/050932.html
>>>>>>
>>>>>> And a proposal to fix:
>>>>>> http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2016-December/051844.html
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Later another proposal triggered the discussion:
>>>>>> http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2017-May/066317.html
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Finally a fix patch pushed into v17.08:
>>>>>> Commit: b58eedfc7dd5 ("igb_uio: issue FLR during open and release of
>>>>>> device file")
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Later a regression report sent related to the pushed patch:
>>>>>> http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2017-September/075236.html
>>>>>>
>>>>>> And a fix for regression integrated into v17.11-rc1:
>>>>>> http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2017-October/079166.html
>>>>>> Commit: 5f6ff30dc507 ("igb_uio: fix interrupt enablement after FLR in
>>>>>> VM")
>>>>>> Commit: 6b9ed026a870 ("igb_uio: fix build with kernel <= 3.17")
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Even after the fix qede PMD reported to be broken:
>>>>>> http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2017-October/079359.html
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So this patch reverts original fix and related commits. The related
>>>>>> igb_uio code part turns back to v17.05 base.
>>>>> [...]
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>> It would be nice to solve this issue in LTS release, but being close to
>>>>>> the release and the error report without details makes it hard to work
>>>>>> more on this issue.
>>>>> With this revert, we are back to the original issue.
>>>>> We must really try the proposed solution.
>>>>> Harish, please describe your issue and think how it could be fixed.
>>>>> Jingjing made it work for i40e.
>>>>> I know it is less effort to request a simple revert.
>>>>> Please let's try to fix it once for all.
>>>> Hi Ferruh/Thomas,
>>>> I’m discussing it internally, so please hold on committing this patch till
>>>> I revert back to you.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks.
>>>> [Harish]
>>>> 1) With the introduction of:
>>>> Commit: b58eedfc7dd5 ("igb_uio: issue FLR during open and release of
>>>> device file”)
>>>     We saw failures with qede PF & SR-IOV VF initialization in PCI passthru
>>> mode.
>>>
>>>> PF PCI passthru mode initialization failure was resolved by:
>>>> “Commit: 5f6ff30dc507 ("igb_uio: fix interrupt enablement after FLR in
>>>> VM")
>> Thank you for the update.
>>
>>>> SR-IOV VF PCI passthru mode initialization issue is that PCI FLR and
>>>> related device cleanup is not completed by the time VF driver starts
>>>> loading. It results in the mbox command failure sent over the HW channel
>>>> between VF and PF.
>> This seems same reason why i40e added a check and wait loop.
>>
>>>> Even though pci_reset_function() waits for the stipulated amount of time
>>>> per standards, VF FLR takes longer than that and pci_reset_function() &
>>>> igb_uio_open() call returns before FLR completes and VF PMD driver tries
>>>> to load before FLR completes leading to VF PMD initialization failure.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> We can work around this problem by adding driver delay/retry logic since
>>>> there is no deterministic way of detecting FLR completion. But this is
>>>> going to increase the driver load time.
>>>>
>>>> 2) With the above patch ("igb_uio: issue FLR during open and release of
>>>> device file), FLR is going to be issued unconditionally on all devices
>>>> during igb_uio_open. We think it’s an over kill. FLR is required only for
>>>> previous abnormal app termination. We already handle the abnormal app
>>>> termination by doing necessary cleanup in the driver during load. This
>>>> cleanup is more efficient as it is done only when required. So we feel
>>>> that the drivers/devices needing such cleanup (the two cases listed
>>>> below)  should do it conditionally when required rather than
>>>> igb_uio_open() unconditionally performing FLR all the time.
>>>>
>>>> e.g.,
>>>     - cdb166963cae ("net/liquidio: add API for VF FLR”)
>> Both 1) and 2) related to the pci_reset during open().
>> But the main functionality we are looking for is the pci_reset in release().
>> So we can remove reset during open() [1].
>>
>> Will disabling pci_reset in open() [2] solve your problems?
>>
>> Jingjing, Jianfeng,
>> What do you think?
> 
> If [2] can work for all drivers, I agree with this option.

OK, I will send this as a patch to make it easy to test and discuss.

> 
> Thanks,
> Jianfeng
> 
>>
>>
>> [1]
>> Perhaps will need to revert or partially revert liquidio patch after this.
>>
>> [2]
>> disable line "pci_reset_function(dev);" in the igbuio_pci_open()
>> http://dpdk.org/browse/dpdk/tree/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/igb_uio/igb_uio.c#n339
>>
> 



More information about the dev mailing list