[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 4/6] examples/ipsec-secgw: add correct padding to tunnel mode
aviadye at dev.mellanox.co.il
Mon Oct 23 13:40:15 CEST 2017
I talked with Akhil. I will send v3 of patches by EOD and hold back this
The reason I don't have time to deep dive regression tests and get back
with an example in the upcoming days.
On 10/23/2017 1:54 PM, De Lara Guarch, Pablo wrote:
> Hi Aviad,
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Gonzalez Monroy, Sergio
>> Sent: Friday, October 20, 2017 6:56 AM
>> To: aviadye at dev.mellanox.co.il; dev at dpdk.org; De Lara Guarch, Pablo
>> <pablo.de.lara.guarch at intel.com>; aviadye at mellanox.com
>> Cc: borisp at mellanox.com; akhil.goyal at nxp.com;
>> hemant.agrawal at nxp.com; Nicolau, Radu <radu.nicolau at intel.com>;
>> Doherty, Declan <declan.doherty at intel.com>; liranl at mellanox.com;
>> nelio.laranjeiro at 6wind.com; thomas at monjalon.net
>> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev][PATCH v2 4/6] examples/ipsec-secgw: add correct
>> padding to tunnel mode
>> Hi Aviad,
>> I think you missed my question on v1 for this patch.
>> Could you provide an example where the pad calculation with the current
>> code is wrong?
> Could you reply to the comments from Sergio and Radu?
> We should try to get this merged ASAP.
More information about the dev