[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 2/3] eal: add u64 bit variant for reciprocal

[Pavan Nikhilesh Bhagavatula]

Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2017 14:17:27 +0530
From: Pavan Nikhilesh Bhagavatula <pbhagavatula at caviumnetworks.com>
To: "Dumitrescu, Cristian" <cristian.dumitrescu at intel.com>, techboard at dpdk.org, govboard at dpdk.org, stephen at networkplumber.org, ktraynor at redhat.com
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 2/3] eal: add u64 bit variant for reciprocal
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)

On Wed, Sep 06, 2017 at 05:05:52PM +0000, Dumitrescu, Cristian wrote:
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Stephen Hemminger [mailto:stephen at networkplumber.org]
> > Sent: Wednesday, September 6, 2017 4:37 PM
> > To: Pavan Nikhilesh Bhagavatula <pbhagavatula at caviumnetworks.com>
> > Cc: Kevin Traynor <ktraynor at redhat.com>; Dumitrescu, Cristian
> > <cristian.dumitrescu at intel.com>; dev at dpdk.org
> > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 2/3] eal: add u64 bit variant for reciprocal
> >
> > On Wed, 6 Sep 2017 20:11:34 +0530
> > Pavan Nikhilesh Bhagavatula <pbhagavatula at caviumnetworks.com> wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, Sep 06, 2017 at 01:28:24PM +0100, Kevin Traynor wrote:
> > > > On 09/06/2017 11:21 AM, Pavan Nikhilesh wrote:
> > > > > From: Pavan Bhagavatula <pbhagavatula at caviumnetworks.com>
> > > > >
> > > > > Currently, rte_reciprocal only supports unsigned 32bit divisors. This
> > > > > commit adds support for unsigned 64bit divisors.
> > > > >
> > > > > Rename unsigned 32bit specific functions appropriately and update
> > > > > librte_sched accordingly.
> > > > >
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Pavan Nikhilesh <pbhagavatula at caviumnetworks.com>
> > > > > ---
> > > > >  lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/eal/rte_eal_version.map   |   3 +-
> > > > >  lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_reciprocal.h  | 109
> > ++++++++++++++++++++--
> > > > >  lib/librte_eal/common/rte_reciprocal.c          | 116
> > +++++++++++++++++++++---
> > > > >  lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/rte_eal_version.map |   3 +-
> > > > >  lib/librte_sched/Makefile                       |   4 +-
> > > > >  lib/librte_sched/rte_sched.c                    |   9 +-
> > > > >  6 files changed, 219 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
> > > > >
> > > > > diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/eal/rte_eal_version.map
> > b/lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/eal/rte_eal_version.map
> > > > > index 90d7258..59a85bb 100644
> > > > > --- a/lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/eal/rte_eal_version.map
> > > > > +++ b/lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/eal/rte_eal_version.map
> > > > > @@ -241,6 +241,7 @@ EXPERIMENTAL {
> > > > >  DPDK_17.11 {
> > > > >  	global:
> > > > >
> > > > > -	rte_reciprocal_value;
> > > > > +	rte_reciprocal_value_u32;
> > > > > +	rte_reciprocal_value_u64;
> > > > >
> > > > >  } DPDK_17.08;
> > > > > diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_reciprocal.h
> > b/lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_reciprocal.h
> > > > > index b6d752f..85599e6 100644
> > > > > --- a/lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_reciprocal.h
> > > > > +++ b/lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_reciprocal.h
> > > >
> > > > Hi Pavan, sorry for commenting late but the license in v1 of this file
> > > > states it cannot be removed. It is not included in later versions - can
> > > > you explain why?
> > > >
> > > Hi Kevin,
> > >
> > > I have misinterpreted this mail
> > > http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2017-August/073781.html,
> > > any suggestion on how to proceed on this further?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Pavan
> >
> > License issues need legal advice (TAB could ask LF if required).
> > Sorry, I am a cynic engineer not a lawyer.
> >
> > Easiest solution is to find equivalent code in FreeBSD or some other project
> > which does not have the restrictions.
>
> How about just adding your copyright on the existing BSD license?

I can add the zlib[1] license over the BSD license. An approval from the
Governing Board and the Technical Board would be good.

[1] https://opensource.org/licenses/Zlib

Thanks,
Pavan.