[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 00/17] build DPDK libs and some drivers with meson/ninja

Wiles, Keith keith.wiles at intel.com
Tue Sep 12 16:00:13 CEST 2017


> On Sep 12, 2017, at 8:26 AM, Wiles, Keith <keith.wiles at intel.com> wrote:
> 
>> 
>> On Sep 12, 2017, at 8:24 AM, Richardson, Bruce <bruce.richardson at intel.com> wrote:
>> 
>> On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 02:21:22PM +0100, Wiles, Keith wrote:
>>> 
>>>> On Sep 12, 2017, at 5:37 AM, Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson at intel.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> V2 changes:
>>>> * fixed copyright notices, updated 2016 to 2017
>>>> * removed dependency on kconfig file in kernel build tree
>>>> * marked pmdinfogen as a "native" binary, in preparation for future cross-
>>>> compilation work
>>>> * added in additional warning flags for compatibility with existing system
>>>> ——
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> Once reviewed and tested a bit, I hope to apply this set - or a new
>>>> revision of it - to the build-next tree, to serve as a baseline for others
>>>> to use and to add the missing functionality to.
>>> 
>>> I would really like to see these patches in a build-next tree as it is much easier to work with and help with changes then patches on the master.
>>> 
>>> When can we have a build-next tree created?
>>> 
>> Tree already exists. I'm just waiting on a bit more review and ideally
>> an ack before I apply this set there.
> 
> Not sure what you are waiting for as an ack is not going to make much of a difference IMO :-)

I pulled down the dpdk-next-build tree and applied the patches, things work and build, but a number of compiler warns pop up. I think we can ack this one and I know a number of things need to be fixed.

So I am going to ack this patch set for the dpdk-next-build tree.

Acked-by: Keith Wiles <keith.wiles at intel.com>

> 
>> 
>> http://dpdk.org/browse/draft/dpdk-next-build/
>> 
>> /Bruce
> 
> Regards,
> Keith

Regards,
Keith



More information about the dev mailing list