[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/5] eal/memory: rename memseg member phys to iova addr
santosh
santosh.shukla at caviumnetworks.com
Mon Sep 18 17:08:07 CEST 2017
Hi Anatoly,
On Monday 18 September 2017 08:34 PM, Burakov, Anatoly wrote:
> On 05-Sep-17 11:31 AM, Santosh Shukla wrote:
>> Renaming rte_memseg {.phys_addr} to {.iova_addr}
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Santosh Shukla <santosh.shukla at caviumnetworks.com>
>> ---
>> v1 --> v2:
>> - includes freebsdp v1 build fixes.
>>
>> lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/eal/eal_memory.c | 4 ++--
>> lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_memory.c | 2 +-
>> lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_memory.h | 4 ++--
>> lib/librte_eal/common/rte_malloc.c | 5 +++--
>> lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal_memory.c | 8 ++++----
>> lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal_vfio.c | 4 ++--
>> 6 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/eal/eal_memory.c b/lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/eal/eal_memory.c
>> index 10c2e121f..d8882dcef 100644
>> --- a/lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/eal/eal_memory.c
>> +++ b/lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/eal/eal_memory.c
>> @@ -73,7 +73,7 @@ rte_eal_hugepage_init(void)
>> /* for debug purposes, hugetlbfs can be disabled */
>> if (internal_config.no_hugetlbfs) {
>> addr = malloc(internal_config.memory);
>> - mcfg->memseg[0].phys_addr = (iova_addr_t)(uintptr_t)addr;
>> + mcfg->memseg[0].iova_addr = (iova_addr_t)(uintptr_t)addr;
>> mcfg->memseg[0].addr = addr;
>> mcfg->memseg[0].hugepage_sz = RTE_PGSIZE_4K;
>> mcfg->memseg[0].len = internal_config.memory;
>> @@ -114,7 +114,7 @@ rte_eal_hugepage_init(void)
>> seg = &mcfg->memseg[seg_idx++];
>> seg->addr = addr;
>> - seg->phys_addr = physaddr;
>> + seg->iova_addr = (iova_addr_t)physaddr;
>> seg->hugepage_sz = hpi->hugepage_sz;
>> seg->len = hpi->hugepage_sz;
>> seg->nchannel = mcfg->nchannel;
>> diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_memory.c b/lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_memory.c
>> index 996877ef5..5ed83d20a 100644
>> --- a/lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_memory.c
>> +++ b/lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_memory.c
>> @@ -100,7 +100,7 @@ rte_dump_physmem_layout(FILE *f)
>> "virt:%p, socket_id:%"PRId32", "
>> "hugepage_sz:%"PRIu64", nchannel:%"PRIx32", "
>> "nrank:%"PRIx32"\n", i,
>> - mcfg->memseg[i].phys_addr,
>> + mcfg->memseg[i].iova_addr,
>> mcfg->memseg[i].len,
>> mcfg->memseg[i].addr,
>> mcfg->memseg[i].socket_id,
>> diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_memory.h b/lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_memory.h
>> index 5face8c86..6b148ba8e 100644
>> --- a/lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_memory.h
>> +++ b/lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_memory.h
>> @@ -98,14 +98,14 @@ enum rte_page_sizes {
>> */
>> #define __rte_cache_min_aligned __rte_aligned(RTE_CACHE_LINE_MIN_SIZE)
>> -typedef uint64_t iova_addr_t; /**< Physical address definition. */
>> +typedef uint64_t iova_addr_t; /**< Iova address definition. */
>> #define RTE_BAD_PHYS_ADDR ((iova_addr_t)-1)
>> /**
>> * Physical memory segment descriptor.
>> */
>> struct rte_memseg {
>> - iova_addr_t phys_addr; /**< Start physical address. */
>> + iova_addr_t iova_addr; /**< Start iova(_pa or _va) address. */
>> RTE_STD_C11
>> union {
>> void *addr; /**< Start virtual address. */
>> diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/common/rte_malloc.c b/lib/librte_eal/common/rte_malloc.c
>> index 3ce6034bf..b65a06f9d 100644
>> --- a/lib/librte_eal/common/rte_malloc.c
>> +++ b/lib/librte_eal/common/rte_malloc.c
>> @@ -254,7 +254,8 @@ rte_malloc_virt2phy(const void *addr)
>> const struct malloc_elem *elem = malloc_elem_from_data(addr);
>> if (elem == NULL)
>> return RTE_BAD_PHYS_ADDR;
>> - if (elem->ms->phys_addr == RTE_BAD_PHYS_ADDR)
>> + if (elem->ms->iova_addr == RTE_BAD_PHYS_ADDR)
>> return RTE_BAD_PHYS_ADDR;
>> - return elem->ms->phys_addr + ((uintptr_t)addr - (uintptr_t)elem->ms->addr);
>> + return elem->ms->iova_addr +
>> + ((uintptr_t)addr - (uintptr_t)elem->ms->addr);
>
> Hi Santosh,
>
> I understand that this is a simple search-replace patch, but maybe you could go ahead and fix this to be RTE_PTR_DIFF, like in below case.
>
Agree, Little scared to do more than one change in patch series ;).
Will do. It as separate patch, if that makes sense.
Thanks.
More information about the dev
mailing list