[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/5] eal/memory: rename memseg member phys to iova addr
Burakov, Anatoly
anatoly.burakov at intel.com
Mon Sep 18 17:11:36 CEST 2017
On 18-Sep-17 4:08 PM, santosh wrote:
> Hi Anatoly,
>
>
> On Monday 18 September 2017 08:34 PM, Burakov, Anatoly wrote:
>> On 05-Sep-17 11:31 AM, Santosh Shukla wrote:
>>> Renaming rte_memseg {.phys_addr} to {.iova_addr}
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Santosh Shukla <santosh.shukla at caviumnetworks.com>
>>> ---
>>> v1 --> v2:
>>> - includes freebsdp v1 build fixes.
>>>
>>> lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/eal/eal_memory.c | 4 ++--
>>> lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_memory.c | 2 +-
>>> lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_memory.h | 4 ++--
>>> lib/librte_eal/common/rte_malloc.c | 5 +++--
>>> lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal_memory.c | 8 ++++----
>>> lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal_vfio.c | 4 ++--
>>> 6 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/eal/eal_memory.c b/lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/eal/eal_memory.c
>>> index 10c2e121f..d8882dcef 100644
>>> --- a/lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/eal/eal_memory.c
>>> +++ b/lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/eal/eal_memory.c
>>> @@ -73,7 +73,7 @@ rte_eal_hugepage_init(void)
>>> /* for debug purposes, hugetlbfs can be disabled */
>>> if (internal_config.no_hugetlbfs) {
>>> addr = malloc(internal_config.memory);
>>> - mcfg->memseg[0].phys_addr = (iova_addr_t)(uintptr_t)addr;
>>> + mcfg->memseg[0].iova_addr = (iova_addr_t)(uintptr_t)addr;
>>> mcfg->memseg[0].addr = addr;
>>> mcfg->memseg[0].hugepage_sz = RTE_PGSIZE_4K;
>>> mcfg->memseg[0].len = internal_config.memory;
>>> @@ -114,7 +114,7 @@ rte_eal_hugepage_init(void)
>>> seg = &mcfg->memseg[seg_idx++];
>>> seg->addr = addr;
>>> - seg->phys_addr = physaddr;
>>> + seg->iova_addr = (iova_addr_t)physaddr;
>>> seg->hugepage_sz = hpi->hugepage_sz;
>>> seg->len = hpi->hugepage_sz;
>>> seg->nchannel = mcfg->nchannel;
>>> diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_memory.c b/lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_memory.c
>>> index 996877ef5..5ed83d20a 100644
>>> --- a/lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_memory.c
>>> +++ b/lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_memory.c
>>> @@ -100,7 +100,7 @@ rte_dump_physmem_layout(FILE *f)
>>> "virt:%p, socket_id:%"PRId32", "
>>> "hugepage_sz:%"PRIu64", nchannel:%"PRIx32", "
>>> "nrank:%"PRIx32"\n", i,
>>> - mcfg->memseg[i].phys_addr,
>>> + mcfg->memseg[i].iova_addr,
>>> mcfg->memseg[i].len,
>>> mcfg->memseg[i].addr,
>>> mcfg->memseg[i].socket_id,
>>> diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_memory.h b/lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_memory.h
>>> index 5face8c86..6b148ba8e 100644
>>> --- a/lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_memory.h
>>> +++ b/lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_memory.h
>>> @@ -98,14 +98,14 @@ enum rte_page_sizes {
>>> */
>>> #define __rte_cache_min_aligned __rte_aligned(RTE_CACHE_LINE_MIN_SIZE)
>>> -typedef uint64_t iova_addr_t; /**< Physical address definition. */
>>> +typedef uint64_t iova_addr_t; /**< Iova address definition. */
>>> #define RTE_BAD_PHYS_ADDR ((iova_addr_t)-1)
>>> /**
>>> * Physical memory segment descriptor.
>>> */
>>> struct rte_memseg {
>>> - iova_addr_t phys_addr; /**< Start physical address. */
>>> + iova_addr_t iova_addr; /**< Start iova(_pa or _va) address. */
>>> RTE_STD_C11
>>> union {
>>> void *addr; /**< Start virtual address. */
>>> diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/common/rte_malloc.c b/lib/librte_eal/common/rte_malloc.c
>>> index 3ce6034bf..b65a06f9d 100644
>>> --- a/lib/librte_eal/common/rte_malloc.c
>>> +++ b/lib/librte_eal/common/rte_malloc.c
>>> @@ -254,7 +254,8 @@ rte_malloc_virt2phy(const void *addr)
>>> const struct malloc_elem *elem = malloc_elem_from_data(addr);
>>> if (elem == NULL)
>>> return RTE_BAD_PHYS_ADDR;
>>> - if (elem->ms->phys_addr == RTE_BAD_PHYS_ADDR)
>>> + if (elem->ms->iova_addr == RTE_BAD_PHYS_ADDR)
>>> return RTE_BAD_PHYS_ADDR;
>>> - return elem->ms->phys_addr + ((uintptr_t)addr - (uintptr_t)elem->ms->addr);
>>> + return elem->ms->iova_addr +
>>> + ((uintptr_t)addr - (uintptr_t)elem->ms->addr);
>>
>> Hi Santosh,
>>
>> I understand that this is a simple search-replace patch, but maybe you could go ahead and fix this to be RTE_PTR_DIFF, like in below case.
>>
> Agree, Little scared to do more than one change in patch series ;).
> Will do. It as separate patch, if that makes sense.
> Thanks.
>
>
>
Fair enough.
--
Thanks,
Anatoly
More information about the dev
mailing list