[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 0/9] eventtimer: introduce event timer adapter

Carrillo, Erik G erik.g.carrillo at intel.com
Tue Apr 3 16:09:22 CEST 2018


Hi Jerin,

Question in-line:

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jerin Jacob [mailto:jerin.jacob at caviumnetworks.com]
> Sent: Monday, April 2, 2018 6:19 PM
> To: Carrillo, Erik G <erik.g.carrillo at intel.com>
> Cc: pbhagavatula at caviumnetworks.com; dev at dpdk.org;
> hemant.agrawal at nxp.com
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 0/9] eventtimer: introduce event timer adapter
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> > Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2018 14:39:45 -0500
> > From: Erik Gabriel Carrillo <erik.g.carrillo at intel.com>
> > To: pbhagavatula at caviumnetworks.com
> > CC: dev at dpdk.org, jerin.jacob at caviumnetworks.com,
> > hemant.agrawal at nxp.com
> > Subject: [PATCH v9 0/9] eventtimer: introduce event timer adapter
> > X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.7.10
> >
> > This patch series contains the next iteration of the Event Timer
> > Adapter library, which abstracts timer mechanisms that are tightly
> > coupled with event devices, and extends the event based programming
> > model so that timer expirations are represented as an event.
> >
> > v9
> > - Addressed comments on previous series from Pavan:
> >   - Don't assume services exist in HW cases
> >   - Adjust retry logic in a couple of tests
> > - Addressed comments on previous series from Jerin:
> >   - Fix build warning
> > - Addressed comments on previous series from Hemant:
> >   - Adjust copyright text
> 
> 1) Please fix following check-patch warnings:
> 
> ### eventtimer: introduce event timer adapter
> 
> ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
> #273: FILE: lib/librte_eventdev/rte_event_timer_adapter.h:238:
> +struct rte_event_timer_adapter * __rte_experimental
> 
> ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
> #303: FILE: lib/librte_eventdev/rte_event_timer_adapter.h:268:
> +struct rte_event_timer_adapter * __rte_experimenta
> 
 
I was aware that checkpatch was complaining here, but the style I used is 
consistent with almost all the existing DPDK code that uses the __rte_experimental
tag.  Should I fix the warning if the style will differ from existing code?

Thanks,
Gabriel



More information about the dev mailing list