[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1] doc: add SPDX Licence to doc files

Hemant Agrawal hemant.agrawal at nxp.com
Tue Apr 10 06:38:47 CEST 2018


On 4/9/2018 7:24 PM, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
> On 4/9/2018 2:11 PM, Marko Kovacevic wrote:
>> Added SPDX headers to doc files to have them aligned with
>> the other doc files.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Marko Kovacevic <marko.kovacevic at intel.com>
> 
> <...>
> 
>>   doc/guides/rel_notes/release_16_04.rst           | 3 +++
>>   doc/guides/rel_notes/release_16_07.rst           | 3 +++
>>   doc/guides/rel_notes/release_16_11.rst           | 3 +++
>>   doc/guides/rel_notes/release_17_02.rst           | 3 +++
>>   doc/guides/rel_notes/release_17_05.rst           | 3 +++
>>   doc/guides/rel_notes/release_17_08.rst           | 3 +++
>>   doc/guides/rel_notes/release_17_11.rst           | 3 +++
>>   doc/guides/rel_notes/release_18_02.rst           | 3 +++
>>   doc/guides/rel_notes/release_2_2.rst             | 3 +++
> 
> Hi Hemant,
> 
> What does it mean to have a license header in release notes?
> It looks unnecessary from both license and copyright point of view, is there a
> legal requirement for it?
> 
> Indeed I was thinking removing the header from the release notes that has it...

LF legal reported it as missing license. All other *.rst files have the 
license headers.

Let me check it with LF Legal.

Regards,
Hemant

> 
> Thanks,
> ferruh
> 



More information about the dev mailing list