[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1] doc: add SPDX Licence to doc files
Hemant Agrawal
hemant.agrawal at nxp.com
Tue Apr 10 06:38:47 CEST 2018
On 4/9/2018 7:24 PM, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
> On 4/9/2018 2:11 PM, Marko Kovacevic wrote:
>> Added SPDX headers to doc files to have them aligned with
>> the other doc files.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Marko Kovacevic <marko.kovacevic at intel.com>
>
> <...>
>
>> doc/guides/rel_notes/release_16_04.rst | 3 +++
>> doc/guides/rel_notes/release_16_07.rst | 3 +++
>> doc/guides/rel_notes/release_16_11.rst | 3 +++
>> doc/guides/rel_notes/release_17_02.rst | 3 +++
>> doc/guides/rel_notes/release_17_05.rst | 3 +++
>> doc/guides/rel_notes/release_17_08.rst | 3 +++
>> doc/guides/rel_notes/release_17_11.rst | 3 +++
>> doc/guides/rel_notes/release_18_02.rst | 3 +++
>> doc/guides/rel_notes/release_2_2.rst | 3 +++
>
> Hi Hemant,
>
> What does it mean to have a license header in release notes?
> It looks unnecessary from both license and copyright point of view, is there a
> legal requirement for it?
>
> Indeed I was thinking removing the header from the release notes that has it...
LF legal reported it as missing license. All other *.rst files have the
license headers.
Let me check it with LF Legal.
Regards,
Hemant
>
> Thanks,
> ferruh
>
More information about the dev
mailing list