[dpdk-dev] [RFC] checkpatch: don't complain about SPDX tag format
Stephen Hemminger
stephen at networkplumber.org
Tue Apr 17 23:49:19 CEST 2018
Since DPDK developers have decided to use a different tag format
than the kernel developers, ignore warnings about SPDX tags.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <stephen at networkplumber.org>
---
IMHO would have been better to use the kernel SPDX style and
keep the check but that appears to be a minority opinion.
devtools/checkpatches.sh | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/devtools/checkpatches.sh b/devtools/checkpatches.sh
index 7676a6b50141..b438fbcd6737 100755
--- a/devtools/checkpatches.sh
+++ b/devtools/checkpatches.sh
@@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ options="--no-tree"
options="$options --max-line-length=$length"
options="$options --show-types"
options="$options --ignore=LINUX_VERSION_CODE,\
-FILE_PATH_CHANGES,MAINTAINERS_STYLE,\
+FILE_PATH_CHANGES,MAINTAINERS_STYLE,SPDX_LICENSE_TAG,\
VOLATILE,PREFER_PACKED,PREFER_ALIGNED,PREFER_PRINTF,\
PREFER_KERNEL_TYPES,BIT_MACRO,CONST_STRUCT,\
SPLIT_STRING,LONG_LINE_STRING,\
--
2.17.0
More information about the dev
mailing list