[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 3/5] bus/vdev: bus scan by multi-process channel
Tan, Jianfeng
jianfeng.tan at intel.com
Tue Apr 24 07:22:30 CEST 2018
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Burakov, Anatoly
> Sent: Monday, April 23, 2018 5:55 PM
> To: Tan, Jianfeng; dev at dpdk.org
> Cc: thomas at monjalon.net
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 3/5] bus/vdev: bus scan by multi-process
> channel
>
> On 20-Apr-18 5:57 PM, Jianfeng Tan wrote:
> > To scan the vdevs in primary, we send request to primary process
> > to obtain the names for vdevs.
> >
> > Only the name is shared from the primary. In probe(), the device
> > driver is supposed to locate (or request more) the detail
> > information from the primary.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jianfeng Tan <jianfeng.tan at intel.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Qi Zhang <qi.z.zhang at intel.com>
> > ---
>
> <...>
>
> > +static int
> > +vdev_action(const struct rte_mp_msg *mp_msg, const void *peer)
> > +{
> > + struct rte_vdev_device *dev;
> > + struct rte_mp_msg mp_resp;
> > + struct vdev_param *ou = (struct vdev_param *)&mp_resp.param;
> > + const struct vdev_param *in = (const struct vdev_param *)mp_msg-
> >param;
> > + const char *devname;
> > + int num;
> > +
> > + strcpy(mp_resp.name, "vdev");
>
> This string is used in a lot of places, so... #define? also, i think
> action name is a bit too short. maybe make it more descriptive, like
> "bus_vdev" or something to that effect?
>
> Also, i think Coverity will complain about not checking string length,
> so... strlcpy()?
Will do in next version.
>
> > + mp_resp.len_param = sizeof(*ou);
> > + mp_resp.num_fds = 0;
> > +
> > + switch (in->type) {
> > + case VDEV_SCAN_REQ:
> > + ou->type = VDEV_SCAN_ONE;
> > + ou->num = 1;
> > + num = 0;
> > +
> > + rte_spinlock_lock(&vdev_device_list_lock);
> > + TAILQ_FOREACH(dev, &vdev_device_list, next) {
> > + devname = rte_vdev_device_name(dev);
> > + if (strlen(devname) == 0)
> > + VDEV_LOG(INFO, "vdev with no name is not
> sent");
>
> The comment says it's "not sent" but code doesn't seem to indicate that
> this will happen. Forgot "continue"?
Nice catch, will fix.
Thanks,
Jianfeng
>
> > + VDEV_LOG(INFO, "send vdev, %s", devname);
> > + strlcpy(ou->name, devname,
> RTE_DEV_NAME_MAX_LEN);
> > + if (rte_mp_sendmsg(&mp_resp) < 0)
> > + VDEV_LOG(ERR, "send vdev, %s, failed, %s",
> > + devname, strerror(rte_errno));
> > + num++;
> > + }
>
> Once all of that is addressed,
>
> Reviewed-by: Anatoly Burakov <anatoly.burakov at intel.com>
>
> --
> Thanks,
> Anatoly
More information about the dev
mailing list