[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/3] net/vdpa_virtio_pci: introduce vdpa sample driver
Maxime Coquelin
maxime.coquelin at redhat.com
Tue Feb 6 15:24:19 CET 2018
Hi Xiao,
On 02/04/2018 03:55 PM, Xiao Wang wrote:
> This driver is a reference sample of making vDPA device driver based
> on vhost lib, this driver uses a standard virtio-net PCI device as
> vDPA device, it can serve as a backend for a virtio-net pci device
> in nested VM.
>
> The key driver ops implemented are:
>
> * vdpa_virtio_eng_init
> Mapping virtio pci device with VFIO into userspace, and read device
> capability and intialize internal data.
>
> * vdpa_virtio_eng_uninit
> Release the mapped device.
>
> * vdpa_virtio_info_query
> Device capability reporting, e.g. queue number, features.
>
> * vdpa_virtio_dev_config
> With the guest virtio information provideed by vhost lib, this
> function configures device and IOMMU to set up vhost datapath,
> which includes: Rx/Tx vring, VFIO interrupt, kick relay.
>
> * vdpa_virtio_dev_close
> Unset the stuff that are configured previously by dev_conf.
>
> This driver requires the virtio device supports VIRTIO_F_IOMMU_PLATFORM
> , because the buffer address written in desc is IOVA.
>
> Because vDPA driver needs to set up MSI-X vector to interrupt the guest,
> only vfio-pci is supported currently.
>
> Signed-off-by: Xiao Wang<xiao.w.wang at intel.com>
> ---
> config/common_base | 6 +
> config/common_linuxapp | 1 +
> drivers/net/Makefile | 1 +
> drivers/net/vdpa_virtio_pci/Makefile | 31 +
> .../net/vdpa_virtio_pci/rte_eth_vdpa_virtio_pci.c | 1527 ++++++++++++++++++++
> .../rte_vdpa_virtio_pci_version.map | 4 +
> mk/rte.app.mk | 1 +
> 7 files changed, 1571 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 drivers/net/vdpa_virtio_pci/Makefile
> create mode 100644 drivers/net/vdpa_virtio_pci/rte_eth_vdpa_virtio_pci.c
> create mode 100644 drivers/net/vdpa_virtio_pci/rte_vdpa_virtio_pci_version.map
Is there a specific constraint that makes you expose PCI functions and
duplicate a lot of vfio code into the driver?
Wouldn't it be better (if possible) to use RTE_PMD_REGISTER_PCI() & co.
to benefit from all the existing infrastructure?
Maxime
More information about the dev
mailing list