[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] bnxt: Fix bug with duplicate pattern for 5tuple filter

[Somnath Kotur]

When user re-issues same 5 tuple filter pattern cmd with different
destination queue, it would flag it as an existing match.
However, when deletion on this filter was attempted, it would crash as the
'vnic' from which the filter was being removed from would be different.
Fix by updating the filter in the scenario where there is a pattern match
and only the destination queue varies.

Signed-off-by: Somnath Kotur <somnath.kotur at broadcom.com>
---
 drivers/net/bnxt/bnxt_ethdev.c | 32 +++++++++++++++++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/bnxt/bnxt_ethdev.c b/drivers/net/bnxt/bnxt_ethdev.c
index 6f8a633..6af1267 100644
--- a/drivers/net/bnxt/bnxt_ethdev.c
+++ b/drivers/net/bnxt/bnxt_ethdev.c
@@ -1953,7 +1953,8 @@ static int bnxt_mtu_set_op(struct rte_eth_dev *eth_dev, uint16_t new_mtu)
 
 static struct bnxt_filter_info*
 bnxt_match_ntuple_filter(struct bnxt *bp,
-			 struct bnxt_filter_info *bfilter)
+			 struct bnxt_filter_info *bfilter,
+			 struct bnxt_vnic_info **mvnic)
 {
 	struct bnxt_filter_info *mfilter = NULL;
 	int i;
@@ -1972,8 +1973,11 @@ static int bnxt_mtu_set_op(struct rte_eth_dev *eth_dev, uint16_t new_mtu)
 			    bfilter->dst_port == mfilter->dst_port &&
 			    bfilter->dst_port_mask == mfilter->dst_port_mask &&
 			    bfilter->flags == mfilter->flags &&
-			    bfilter->enables == mfilter->enables)
+			    bfilter->enables == mfilter->enables) {
+				if (mvnic)
+					*mvnic = vnic;
 				return mfilter;
+			}
 		}
 	}
 	return NULL;
@@ -1985,7 +1989,7 @@ static int bnxt_mtu_set_op(struct rte_eth_dev *eth_dev, uint16_t new_mtu)
 		       enum rte_filter_op filter_op)
 {
 	struct bnxt_filter_info *bfilter, *mfilter, *filter1;
-	struct bnxt_vnic_info *vnic, *vnic0;
+	struct bnxt_vnic_info *vnic, *vnic0, *mvnic;
 	int ret;
 
 	if (nfilter->flags != RTE_5TUPLE_FLAGS) {
@@ -2023,12 +2027,22 @@ static int bnxt_mtu_set_op(struct rte_eth_dev *eth_dev, uint16_t new_mtu)
 	bfilter->ethertype = 0x800;
 	bfilter->enables |= NTUPLE_FLTR_ALLOC_INPUT_EN_ETHERTYPE;
 
-	mfilter = bnxt_match_ntuple_filter(bp, bfilter);
+	mfilter = bnxt_match_ntuple_filter(bp, bfilter, &mvnic);
 
-	if (mfilter != NULL && filter_op == RTE_ETH_FILTER_ADD) {
-		RTE_LOG(ERR, PMD, "filter exists.");
+	if (mfilter != NULL && filter_op == RTE_ETH_FILTER_ADD &&
+	    bfilter->dst_id == mfilter->dst_id) {
+		RTE_LOG(ERR, PMD, "filter exists.\n");
 		ret = -EEXIST;
 		goto free_filter;
+	} else if (mfilter != NULL && filter_op == RTE_ETH_FILTER_ADD &&
+		   bfilter->dst_id != mfilter->dst_id) {
+		mfilter->dst_id = vnic->fw_vnic_id;
+		ret = bnxt_hwrm_set_ntuple_filter(bp, mfilter->dst_id, mfilter);
+		STAILQ_REMOVE(&mvnic->filter, mfilter, bnxt_filter_info, next);
+		STAILQ_INSERT_TAIL(&vnic->filter, mfilter, next);
+		RTE_LOG(ERR, PMD, "filter with matching pattern exists.\n");
+		RTE_LOG(ERR, PMD, " Updated it to the new destination queue\n");
+		goto free_filter;
 	}
 	if (mfilter == NULL && filter_op == RTE_ETH_FILTER_DELETE) {
 		RTE_LOG(ERR, PMD, "filter doesn't exist.");
@@ -2050,11 +2064,11 @@ static int bnxt_mtu_set_op(struct rte_eth_dev *eth_dev, uint16_t new_mtu)
 		}
 		ret = bnxt_hwrm_clear_ntuple_filter(bp, mfilter);
 
-		STAILQ_REMOVE(&vnic->filter, mfilter, bnxt_filter_info,
-			      next);
+		STAILQ_REMOVE(&vnic->filter, mfilter, bnxt_filter_info, next);
 		bnxt_free_filter(bp, mfilter);
-		bfilter->fw_l2_filter_id = -1;
+		mfilter->fw_l2_filter_id = -1;
 		bnxt_free_filter(bp, bfilter);
+		bfilter->fw_l2_filter_id = -1;
 	}
 
 	return 0;
-- 
1.9.1