[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] test: new sched WRR unit-test
Dewar, Alan
ad759e at intl.att.com
Wed Jan 3 15:02:40 CET 2018
Hi Cristian,
In response to your comment at the very end, "Please keep the unit test in the same patch set with the code", any revised change will include the new unit-tests.
Regards
Alan
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dumitrescu, Cristian [mailto:cristian.dumitrescu at intel.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 02, 2018 4:15 PM
> To: alangordondewar at gmail.com
> Cc: dev at dpdk.org; Alan Dewar <alan.dewar at att.com>
> Subject: RE: [PATCH v2] test: new sched WRR unit-test
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: alangordondewar at gmail.com [mailto:alangordondewar at gmail.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2017 9:05 AM
> > To: Dumitrescu, Cristian <cristian.dumitrescu at intel.com>
> > Cc: dev at dpdk.org; Alan Dewar <alan.dewar at att.com>
> > Subject: [PATCH v2] test: new sched WRR unit-test
> >
> > From: Alan Dewar <alan.dewar at att.com>
> >
> > New unit-test for the librte_sched WRR weighting code.
> >
> > With the standard 17.11 code, the first three sub-tests pass, but the
> > last three fail due to bugs in the WRR weighting code.
> >
> > With v1 of the "sched: fix overflow errors in WRR weighting code"
> > patch the first five sub-tests pass, and the last sub-test fails badly.
> >
> > With v2 of the "sched: fix overflow errors in WRR weighting code"
> > patch the first five sub-tests pass, and the last sub-test is a very
> > near miss (i.e. measured packets counts are one away from the expected
> > counts).
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Alan Dewar <alan.dewar at att.com>
> > ---
> > v2 - add new 255-254-253-1 weightings sub-test
> >
> > test/test/Makefile | 1 +
> > test/test/test_sched_wrr.c | 491
> > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 2 files changed, 492 insertions(+)
> > create mode 100644 test/test/test_sched_wrr.c
> >
> > diff --git a/test/test/Makefile b/test/test/Makefile index
> > bb54c98..0ab0ed3 100644
> > --- a/test/test/Makefile
> > +++ b/test/test/Makefile
> > @@ -173,6 +173,7 @@ SRCS-$(CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_NET) += test_crc.c ifeq
> > ($(CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_SCHED),y) SRCS-y += test_red.c SRCS-y +=
> > test_sched.c
> > +SRCS-y += test_sched_wrr.c
> > endif
> >
> > SRCS-$(CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_METER) += test_meter.c diff --git
> > a/test/test/test_sched_wrr.c b/test/test/test_sched_wrr.c new file
> > mode 100644 index 0000000..df5a231
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/test/test/test_sched_wrr.c
> > @@ -0,0 +1,491 @@
> > +/*-
> > + * BSD LICENSE
> > + *
> > + * Copyright(c) 2010-2014 Intel Corporation. All rights reserved.
> > + * Copyright(c) 2017 ATT Intellectual Property. All rights reserved.
> > + * All rights reserved.
> > + *
> > + * Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
> > + * modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions
> > + * are met:
> > + *
> > + * * Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright
> > + * notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
> > + * * Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright
> > + * notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in
> > + * the documentation and/or other materials provided with the
> > + * distribution.
> > + * * Neither the name of Intel Corporation nor the names of its
> > + * contributors may be used to endorse or promote products derived
> > + * from this software without specific prior written permission.
> > + *
> > + * THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND
> > CONTRIBUTORS
> > + * "AS IS" AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT
> > NOT
> > + * LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND
> > FITNESS FOR
> > + * A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE
> > COPYRIGHT
> > + * OWNER OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT,
> > INCIDENTAL,
> > + * SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING,
> > BUT NOT
> > + * LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES;
> > LOSS OF USE,
> > + * DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED
> > AND ON ANY
> > + * THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR
> > TORT
> > + * (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT
> > OF THE USE
> > + * OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH
> > DAMAGE.
> > + *
> > + */
> > +
> > +#include <stdlib.h>
> > +#include <stdio.h>
> > +#include <string.h>
> > +#include <stdint.h>
> > +#include <unistd.h>
> > +
> > +#include "test.h"
> > +
> > +#include <rte_cycles.h>
> > +#include <rte_ether.h>
> > +#include <rte_ip.h>
> > +#include <rte_byteorder.h>
> > +#include <rte_sched.h>
> > +
> > +
> > +#define SUBPORT 0
> > +#define PIPE 1
> > +#define TC 0
> > +#define QUEUE 3
> > +
> > +static struct rte_sched_subport_params subport_param[] = {
> > + {
> > + .tb_rate = 1250000000,
> > + .tb_size = 1000000,
> > +
> > + .tc_rate = {1250000000, 1250000000, 1250000000,
> > 1250000000},
> > + .tc_period = 10,
> > + },
> > +};
> > +
> > +static struct rte_sched_pipe_params pipe_profile[] = {
> > + { /* Profile #0 */
> > + .tb_rate = 3051750,
> > + .tb_size = 1000000,
> > +
> > + .tc_rate = {3051750, 3051750, 3051750, 3051750},
> > + .tc_period = 160,
> > +
> > + .wrr_weights = {1, 1, 1, 1,
> > + 1, 1, 1, 1,
> > + 1, 1, 1, 1,
> > + 1, 1, 1, 1},
> > + },
> > +};
> > +
> > +static struct rte_sched_port_params port_param = {
> > + .socket = 0, /* computed */
> > + .rate = 0, /* computed */
> > + .mtu = 1522,
> > + .frame_overhead = RTE_SCHED_FRAME_OVERHEAD_DEFAULT,
> > + .n_subports_per_port = 1,
> > + .n_pipes_per_subport = 1024,
> > + .qsize = {32, 32, 32, 32},
> > + .pipe_profiles = pipe_profile,
> > + .n_pipe_profiles = 1,
> > +};
> > +
> > +#define NB_MBUF (4 * 32)
> > +#define MBUF_DATA_SZ (2048 + RTE_PKTMBUF_HEADROOM)
> > +#define MEMPOOL_CACHE_SZ 0
> > +#define SOCKET 0
> > +
> > +
> > +static struct rte_mempool *
> > +create_mempool(uint32_t total_packets) {
> > + struct rte_mempool *mp;
> > +
> > + mp = rte_mempool_lookup("test_sched wrr");
> > + if (!mp)
> > + mp = rte_pktmbuf_pool_create("test_sched wrr",
> > total_packets,
> > + MEMPOOL_CACHE_SZ, 0, MBUF_DATA_SZ,
> > SOCKET);
> > +
> > + return mp;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void
> > +delete_mempool(struct rte_mempool *mp) {
> > + rte_mempool_free(mp);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void
> > +prepare_pkt(struct rte_mbuf *mbuf, uint32_t tc, uint32_t queue) {
> > + struct ether_hdr *eth_hdr;
> > + struct vlan_hdr *vlan1, *vlan2;
> > + struct ipv4_hdr *ip_hdr;
> > +
> > + /* Simulate a classifier */
> > + eth_hdr = rte_pktmbuf_mtod(mbuf, struct ether_hdr *);
> > + vlan1 = (struct vlan_hdr *)(ð_hdr->ether_type);
> > + vlan2 = (struct vlan_hdr *)((uintptr_t)ð_hdr->ether_type +
> > + sizeof(struct vlan_hdr));
> > + eth_hdr = (struct ether_hdr *)((uintptr_t)ð_hdr->ether_type +
> > + 2 * sizeof(struct vlan_hdr));
> > + ip_hdr = (struct ipv4_hdr *)((uintptr_t)eth_hdr +
> > + sizeof(eth_hdr->ether_type));
> > +
> > + vlan1->vlan_tci = rte_cpu_to_be_16(SUBPORT);
> > + vlan2->vlan_tci = rte_cpu_to_be_16(PIPE);
> > + eth_hdr->ether_type = rte_cpu_to_be_16(ETHER_TYPE_IPv4);
> > + ip_hdr->dst_addr = IPv4(0, 0, TC, QUEUE);
> > +
> > +
> > + rte_sched_port_pkt_write(mbuf, SUBPORT, PIPE, tc, queue,
> > + e_RTE_METER_YELLOW);
> > +
> > + /* 64 byte packet */
> > + mbuf->pkt_len = 60;
> > + mbuf->data_len = 60;
> > +}
> > +
> > +/*
> > + * This function carries out the core of the enqueue/dequeue testing.
> > + * This is where we should detect failures if the WRR code is broken.
> > + */
> > +static int
> > +test_sched_wrr_enqueue_dequeue(const char *subtest_name,
> > + struct rte_mempool *mp,
> > + struct rte_sched_port *port,
> > + struct rte_mbuf **in_mbufs,
> > + struct rte_mbuf **out_mbufs,
> > + int32_t enqueue_packets,
> > + int32_t dequeue_packets,
> > + uint32_t *expected_counts)
> > +{
> > + uint32_t wrr_counts[RTE_SCHED_QUEUES_PER_TRAFFIC_CLASS] = {
> > 0 };
> > + uint32_t pipe;
> > + int32_t i;
> > + int err;
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * Create the packets to be enqueued, spread them evenly across
> > + * each of the four WRR queues of the test-TC
> > + */
> > + for (i = 0; i < enqueue_packets; i++) {
> > + in_mbufs[i] = rte_pktmbuf_alloc(mp);
> > + TEST_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(in_mbufs[i],
> > + "%s: Packet allocation failed on packet "
> > + "%d\n", subtest_name, i);
> > + prepare_pkt(in_mbufs[i], TC, (i & 0x3));
> > + }
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * Queue all the enqueue packets, none should be dropped as the
> > + * four queues should be long enough.
> > + */
> > + err = rte_sched_port_enqueue(port, in_mbufs, enqueue_packets);
> > + TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL(err, enqueue_packets,
> > + "%s: Enqueue failed, err: %d != %d\n",
> > + subtest_name, err, enqueue_packets);
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * Dequeue the required number of packets.
> > + */
> > + err = rte_sched_port_dequeue(port, out_mbufs, dequeue_packets);
> > + TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL(err, dequeue_packets,
> > + "%s: Dequeue failed, err: %d != %d\n",
> > + subtest_name, err, dequeue_packets);
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * Check each packet and count which WRR queue it came from.
> > + */
> > + for (i = 0; i < dequeue_packets; i++) {
> > + enum rte_meter_color color;
> > + uint32_t subport, traffic_class, queue;
> > +
> > + color = rte_sched_port_pkt_read_color(out_mbufs[i]);
> > + TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL(color, e_RTE_METER_YELLOW,
> > + "%s: Wrong color\n", subtest_name);
> > +
> > + rte_sched_port_pkt_read_tree_path(out_mbufs[i],
> > + &subport, &pipe, &traffic_class, &queue);
> > +
> > + TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL(subport, SUBPORT, "%s: Wrong
> > subport\n",
> > + subtest_name);
> > + TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL(pipe, PIPE, "%s: Wrong pipe\n",
> > subtest_name);
> > + TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL(traffic_class, TC,
> > + "%s: Wrong traffic-class\n",
> > subtest_name);
> > + wrr_counts[queue]++;
> > + rte_pktmbuf_free(out_mbufs[i]);
> > + }
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * Check the number of packets dequeued from each WRR queue
> > + * against the expected counts.
> > + */
> > + err = 0;
> > + for (i = 0; i < RTE_SCHED_QUEUES_PER_TRAFFIC_CLASS; i++) {
> > + printf("%s - WRR queue %d, dequeued: %u, expected:
> > %u\n",
> > + subtest_name, i, wrr_counts[i], expected_counts[i]);
> > + if (wrr_counts[i] != expected_counts[i])
> > + err = -1;
> > + }
> > + return err;
> > +}
> > +
> > +/*
> > + * This function does the test config set-up and tear-down.
> > + * If we see failures in here it is probably due to the test configuration.
> > + */
> > +static int
> > +test_sched_wrr_test(const char *subtest_name, uint16_t *tc_qlengths,
> > + uint8_t *wrr_weights, int32_t enqueue_packets,
> > + int32_t dequeue_packets, uint32_t *expected_counts) {
> > + struct rte_mbuf **in_mbufs;
> > + struct rte_mbuf **out_mbufs;
> > + struct rte_mempool *mp = NULL;
> > + struct rte_sched_port *port = NULL;
> > + int32_t total_expected = 0;
> > + uint32_t pipe;
> > + int32_t i;
> > + int err;
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * Some inbound argument checking
> > + */
> > + TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL((tc_qlengths[TC] * 4), enqueue_packets,
> > + "%s: Queue length/Enqueue packet mismatch - "
> > + "%u vs %d\n",
> > + subtest_name, (tc_qlengths[TC] * 4),
> > enqueue_packets);
> > + TEST_ASSERT((dequeue_packets <= enqueue_packets),
> > + "%s: Dequeue packets %d > Enqueue packets %d\n",
> > + subtest_name, dequeue_packets, enqueue_packets);
> > +
> > + for (i = 0; i < RTE_SCHED_QUEUES_PER_TRAFFIC_CLASS; i++)
> > + total_expected += expected_counts[i];
> > +
> > + TEST_ASSERT((dequeue_packets == total_expected),
> > + "%s: Dequeue packets %d != Total expected %u\n",
> > + subtest_name, dequeue_packets, total_expected);
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * Create the mempool and allocate arrays to hold the rte_mbuf
> > pointers
> > + */
> > + mp = create_mempool(enqueue_packets);
> > + TEST_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(mp, "%s: Error creating mempool\n",
> > subtest_name);
> > +
> > + in_mbufs = malloc(sizeof(struct rte_mbuf *) * enqueue_packets);
> > + TEST_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(in_mbufs, "%s: Error creating in_mbuf
> > array\n",
> > + subtest_name);
> > +
> > + out_mbufs = malloc(sizeof(struct rte_mbuf *) * dequeue_packets);
> > + TEST_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(out_mbufs, "%s: Error creating out_mbuf
> > array\n",
> > + subtest_name);
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * Set up the port and pipe profiles with the TC's queue lengths
> > + * and the WRR queue weightings
> > + */
> > + port_param.socket = 0;
> > + port_param.rate = (uint64_t) 10000 * 1000 * 1000 / 8;
> > + for (i = 0; i < RTE_SCHED_TRAFFIC_CLASSES_PER_PIPE; i++)
> > + port_param.qsize[i] = tc_qlengths[i];
> > +
> > + for (i = 0; i < RTE_SCHED_QUEUES_PER_PIPE; i++)
> > + pipe_profile[0].wrr_weights[i] = wrr_weights[i];
> > +
> > + port = rte_sched_port_config(&port_param);
> > + TEST_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(port, "%s: Error config sched port\n",
> > + subtest_name);
> > +
> > + err = rte_sched_subport_config(port, SUBPORT, subport_param);
> > + TEST_ASSERT_SUCCESS(err, "%s: Error config sched, err=%d\n",
> > + subtest_name, err);
> > +
> > + for (pipe = 0; pipe < port_param.n_pipes_per_subport; pipe++) {
> > + err = rte_sched_pipe_config(port, SUBPORT, pipe, 0);
> > + TEST_ASSERT_SUCCESS(err,
> > + "%s: Error config sched pipe %u,
> > err=%d\n",
> > + subtest_name, pipe, err);
> > + }
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * Enqueue and dequeue packets checking that each WRR queue
> > dequeued
> > + * the correct number of packets.
> > + */
> > + err = test_sched_wrr_enqueue_dequeue(subtest_name, mp, port,
> > in_mbufs,
> > + out_mbufs, enqueue_packets,
> > + dequeue_packets,
> > + expected_counts);
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * Free up allocated resources
> > + */
> > + free(in_mbufs);
> > + free(out_mbufs);
> > + rte_sched_port_free(port);
> > + delete_mempool(mp);
> > +
> > + return err;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int
> > +test_sched_wrr_even_weights(void)
> > +{
> > + /*
> > + * Even weighting - each WRR queue should dequeue the same
> > number of
> > + * packets
> > + */
> > + uint16_t tc_qlengths[] = { 64, 64, 64, 64 };
> > + uint8_t wrr_weights[] = { 1, 1, 1, 1, // TC-0
> > + 1, 1, 1, 1, // TC-1
> > + 1, 1, 1, 1, // TC-2
> > + 1, 1, 1, 1 }; // TC-3
> > + int32_t enqueue_packets = 64 * 4;
> > + int32_t dequeue_packets = 32;
> > + uint32_t expected_counts[] = { 8, 8, 8, 8 };
> > +
> > + return test_sched_wrr_test("wrr-even-weights", tc_qlengths,
> > wrr_weights,
> > + enqueue_packets, dequeue_packets,
> > + expected_counts);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int
> > +test_sched_wrr_8_4_2_1_weights(void)
> > +{
> > + /*
> > + * Uneven weightings but with a low LCM of 8 * 4 * 2 * 1 = 64
> > + */
> > + uint16_t tc_qlengths[] = { 64, 64, 64, 64 };
> > + uint8_t wrr_weights[] = { 8, 4, 2, 1, // TC-0
> > + 1, 1, 1, 1,
> > + 1, 1, 1, 1,
> > + 1, 1, 1, 1 };
> > + int32_t enqueue_packets = 64 * 4;
> > + int32_t dequeue_packets = 15;
> > + uint32_t expected_counts[] = { 8, 4, 2, 1 };
> > +
> > + return test_sched_wrr_test("wrr-8-4-2-1-weights", tc_qlengths,
> > + wrr_weights, enqueue_packets,
> > + dequeue_packets, expected_counts); }
> > +
> > +static int
> > +test_sched_wrr_1_2_3_4_weights(void)
> > +{
> > + /*
> > + * Uneven weightings with a low LCM, but weightings in reverse
> > order
> > + * from previous test
> > + */
> > + uint16_t tc_qlengths[] = { 64, 64, 64, 64 };
> > + uint8_t wrr_weights[] = { 1, 2, 3, 4,
> > + 1, 1, 1, 1,
> > + 1, 1, 1, 1,
> > + 1, 1, 1, 1 };
> > + int32_t enqueue_packets = 64 * 4;
> > + int32_t dequeue_packets = 40;
> > + uint32_t expected_counts[] = { 4, 8, 12, 16 };
> > +
> > + return test_sched_wrr_test("wrr-1-2-3-4-weights", tc_qlengths,
> > + wrr_weights, enqueue_packets,
> > + dequeue_packets, expected_counts); }
> > +
> > +static int
> > +test_sched_wrr_11_7_5_3_weights(void)
> > +{
> > + /*
> > + * This test generates a LCM of 11 * 7 * 5 * 3 = 1155.
> > + * 1155 / 3 = 385 which is more than can be fitted in a uint8_t
> > + */
> > + uint16_t tc_qlengths[] = { 64, 64, 64, 64 };
> > + uint8_t wrr_weights[] = { 11, 7, 5, 3,
> > + 1, 1, 1, 1,
> > + 1, 1, 1, 1,
> > + 1, 1, 1, 1 };
> > + int32_t enqueue_packets = 64 * 4;
> > + int32_t dequeue_packets = 26;
> > + uint32_t expected_counts[] = { 11, 7, 5, 3 };
> > +
> > + return test_sched_wrr_test("wrr-11-7-5-3-weights", tc_qlengths,
> > + wrr_weights, enqueue_packets,
> > + dequeue_packets, expected_counts); }
> > +
> > +static int
> > +test_sched_wrr_100_to_97_weights(void)
> > +{
> > + /*
> > + * The ratios between the weightings is small how well will the
> > + * pseudo floating point wrr_cost perform.
> > + */
> > + uint16_t tc_qlengths[] = { 128, 1, 1, 1 };
> > + uint8_t wrr_weights[] = { 100, 99, 98, 97,
> > + 1, 1, 1, 1,
> > + 1, 1, 1, 1,
> > + 1, 1, 1, 1 };
> > + int32_t enqueue_packets = 128 * 4;
> > + int32_t dequeue_packets = 394;
> > + uint32_t expected_counts[] = { 100, 99, 98, 97 };
> > +
> > + return test_sched_wrr_test("wrr-100-to-97-weights", tc_qlengths,
> > + wrr_weights, enqueue_packets,
> > + dequeue_packets, expected_counts); }
> > +
> > +static int
> > +test_sched_wrr_255_254_253_1_weights(void)
> > +{
> > + /*
> > + * This test generates a LCM of 255 * 254 * 253 * 1 = 16386810
> > + * 16386810 / 255 = 64262 = 0xFB06
> > + * 16386810 / 1 = 16386810 = 0xFA0AFF
> > + * 0xFA0AFF needs to be shifted 16 bits left to fit into a uint8_t
> > + * but shifting 0xFB06 16 bits left results in a zero wrr_cost.
> > + *
> > + * This test can fail in two different ways.
> > + *
> > + * Very badly when the dequeued packet counts aren't even close to
> > the
> > + * expected counts due a bug in a recent WRR patch.
> > + *
> > + * A very near miss, when the dequeued packet counts are just one
> > or
> > + * two packets away from the expected counts. This happens
> > because
> > + * the weights of 255, 254, 254 and 1 get converted into wrr_costs
> > + * of 1, 1, 1, 250 respectively. I think that this happens due to
> > + * rounding errors in the pseudo floating point code used by WRR.
> > + */
> > + uint16_t tc_qlengths[] = { 1024, 1, 1, 1 };
> > + uint8_t wrr_weights[] = { 254, 1, 253, 255,
> > + 1, 1, 1, 1,
> > + 1, 1, 1, 1,
> > + 1, 1, 1, 1 };
> > + int32_t enqueue_packets = 1024 * 4;
> > + int32_t dequeue_packets = 255 + 254 + 253 + 1;
> > + uint32_t expected_counts[] = { 254, 1, 253, 255 };
> > +
> > + return test_sched_wrr_test("wrr-255-254-253-1-weights",
> > tc_qlengths,
> > + wrr_weights, enqueue_packets,
> > + dequeue_packets, expected_counts); }
> > +
> > +/**
> > + * WRR test main entrance for library sched */ static int
> > +test_sched_wrr(void)
> > +{
> > + TEST_ASSERT_SUCCESS(test_sched_wrr_even_weights(),
> > + "even-weight test failed\n");
> > + TEST_ASSERT_SUCCESS(test_sched_wrr_8_4_2_1_weights(),
> > + "8-4-2-1-weight test failed\n");
> > + TEST_ASSERT_SUCCESS(test_sched_wrr_1_2_3_4_weights(),
> > + "1-2-3-4-weight test failed\n");
> > + TEST_ASSERT_SUCCESS(test_sched_wrr_11_7_5_3_weights(),
> > + "11-7-5-3-weight test failed\n");
> > + TEST_ASSERT_SUCCESS(test_sched_wrr_100_to_97_weights(),
> > + "100-to-97-weight test failed\n");
> > + TEST_ASSERT_SUCCESS(test_sched_wrr_255_254_253_1_weights(),
> > + "255-254-253-1-weight test failed\n");
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +REGISTER_TEST_COMMAND(sched_wrr_test, test_sched_wrr);
> > --
> > 2.1.4
>
> Please keep the unit test in the same patch set with the code.
>
More information about the dev
mailing list