[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/5] lib: add Port Representors

[Ferruh Yigit]

<...>

> The port representor infrastructure is enabled through a single common, device
> independent, virtual PMD whos context is initialized and enabled through a
> broker instance running within the context of the physical function device
> driver.>
> +-------------------------+       +-------------------------+
> |        rte_ethdev       |       |       rte_ethdev        |
> +-------------------------+       +-------------------------+
> |  Physical Function PMD  |       |  Port Reperesentor PMD  |
> |         +-------------+ |       | +---------+ +---------+ |
> |         | Representor | |       | | dev_data| | dev_ops | |
> |         |    Broker   | |       | +----+----+ +----+----+ |
> |         | +---------+ | |       +------|-----------|------+
> |         | | VF Port | | |              |           |
> |         | | Context +------------------+           |
> |         | +---------+ | |                          |
> |         | +---------+ | |                          |
> |         | | Handler +------------------------------+
> |         | |   Ops   | | |
> |         | +---------+ | |
> |         +-------------+ |
> +-------------------------+
> 
> Creation of representor ports can be achieved either through the --vdev EAL
> option or through the rte_vdev_init() API. Each port representor requires the
> BDF of it's parent PF and the Virtual Function ID of the port which the
> representor will support. During initialization of the representor PMD, it calls
> the broker API to register itself with the PF PMD and to get it's context
> configured which includes the setting up of it's context and ops function
> handlers.

Above no more true, right?